The understandability of OWL statements in controlled English

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Different kinds of controlled natural language (CNL) have been proposed as a front-end for Semantic Web systems, in order to make them more accessible to users with no background in formal notations and methods. This paper investigates whether OWL statements in CNL are indeed easier to understand than in other notations. To this aim, an experiment with 64 participants was conducted that compares a controlled natural language to a classical OWL notation. Concretely, Attempto Controlled English was compared to a simplified version of the Manchester OWL Syntax. For a reliable and tool-independent evaluation of understandability, the experiment is based on a novel evaluation framework making use of simple and intuitive diagrams. The results show that CNL is easier to understand, needs less learning time, and is more accepted by its users.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-115
Number of pages15
JournalSemantic Web
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Semantic Web
Experiments

Keywords

  • Attempto Controlled English (ACE)
  • Controlled natural language
  • Understandability
  • User experiment
  • Web Ontology Language (OWL)

Cite this

@article{f4b5d4aa46f64e2dabea2aee4ab9153a,
title = "The understandability of OWL statements in controlled English",
abstract = "Different kinds of controlled natural language (CNL) have been proposed as a front-end for Semantic Web systems, in order to make them more accessible to users with no background in formal notations and methods. This paper investigates whether OWL statements in CNL are indeed easier to understand than in other notations. To this aim, an experiment with 64 participants was conducted that compares a controlled natural language to a classical OWL notation. Concretely, Attempto Controlled English was compared to a simplified version of the Manchester OWL Syntax. For a reliable and tool-independent evaluation of understandability, the experiment is based on a novel evaluation framework making use of simple and intuitive diagrams. The results show that CNL is easier to understand, needs less learning time, and is more accepted by its users.",
keywords = "Attempto Controlled English (ACE), Controlled natural language, Understandability, User experiment, Web Ontology Language (OWL)",
author = "Tobias Kuhn",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.3233/SW-2012-0063",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "101--115",
journal = "Semantic Web",
issn = "1570-0844",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

The understandability of OWL statements in controlled English. / Kuhn, Tobias.

In: Semantic Web, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2013, p. 101-115.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The understandability of OWL statements in controlled English

AU - Kuhn, Tobias

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Different kinds of controlled natural language (CNL) have been proposed as a front-end for Semantic Web systems, in order to make them more accessible to users with no background in formal notations and methods. This paper investigates whether OWL statements in CNL are indeed easier to understand than in other notations. To this aim, an experiment with 64 participants was conducted that compares a controlled natural language to a classical OWL notation. Concretely, Attempto Controlled English was compared to a simplified version of the Manchester OWL Syntax. For a reliable and tool-independent evaluation of understandability, the experiment is based on a novel evaluation framework making use of simple and intuitive diagrams. The results show that CNL is easier to understand, needs less learning time, and is more accepted by its users.

AB - Different kinds of controlled natural language (CNL) have been proposed as a front-end for Semantic Web systems, in order to make them more accessible to users with no background in formal notations and methods. This paper investigates whether OWL statements in CNL are indeed easier to understand than in other notations. To this aim, an experiment with 64 participants was conducted that compares a controlled natural language to a classical OWL notation. Concretely, Attempto Controlled English was compared to a simplified version of the Manchester OWL Syntax. For a reliable and tool-independent evaluation of understandability, the experiment is based on a novel evaluation framework making use of simple and intuitive diagrams. The results show that CNL is easier to understand, needs less learning time, and is more accepted by its users.

KW - Attempto Controlled English (ACE)

KW - Controlled natural language

KW - Understandability

KW - User experiment

KW - Web Ontology Language (OWL)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885924903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885924903&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/SW-2012-0063

DO - 10.3233/SW-2012-0063

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 101

EP - 115

JO - Semantic Web

JF - Semantic Web

SN - 1570-0844

IS - 1

ER -