The use of Cartography of Controversy within socioscientific issues-based education: students’ mapping of the badger-cattle controversy in England

Andri Christodoulou*, Ralph Levinson, Paul Davies, Marcus Grace, Joanne Nicholl, Willeke Rietdijk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This qualitative study examines the pedagogical potential that a Cartography of Controversy (CoC) approach has in enabling secondary school students to unravel the complexity of socioscientific issues and to communicate about them. The aim was to examine the types of knowledge and the ways in which students approached uncertainty when asked to explore the badger-cattle controversy in England using the CoC approach. A learning sequence focusing on mapping controversies was designed and implemented across three lessons. Data collected from the students’ cartographies and the audio-recordings of their group discussions during the mapping tasks showed that students were able to use scientific, economic, cultural, social, moral and political types of knowledge in their exploration of the controversy. Identifying tensions between different types of knowledge and becoming aware of their own uncertainties about the issue through posing and recording questions allowed students to identify where uncertainty existed within the SSI explored. The CoC approach allowed affordances for understanding the SSI depending on students’ framing of the task (familiarisation, exploration, consolidation) and on the cartography’s function as an observation, visualisation, and reflection tool at different stages of the learning sequence. Implications for further research and practice for developing students’ socioscientific reasoning are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2479-2500
Number of pages22
JournalInternational Journal of Science Education
Volume43
Issue number15
Early online date1 Sept 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by FP7?PEOPLE - International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [grant agreement number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227]. We would like to thank the school, teacher and students that volunteered to take part in this study. The CASSIS project was funded by the FP7-PEOPLE International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (Grant Agreement Number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227).

Funding Information:
We would like to thank the school, teacher and students that volunteered to take part in this study. The CASSIS project was funded by the FP7-PEOPLE International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (Grant Agreement Number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Funding

This work was supported by FP7?PEOPLE - International Research Staff Exchange Scheme [grant agreement number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227]. We would like to thank the school, teacher and students that volunteered to take part in this study. The CASSIS project was funded by the FP7-PEOPLE International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (Grant Agreement Number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227). We would like to thank the school, teacher and students that volunteered to take part in this study. The CASSIS project was funded by the FP7-PEOPLE International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (Grant Agreement Number: PIRSES-GA-2013-612227).

FundersFunder number
FP7-PEOPLE International Research Staff Exchange SchemePIRSES-GA-2013-612227
International Research Staff Exchange Scheme
Seventh Framework Programme

    Keywords

    • cartography of controversy
    • qualitative study
    • secondary education
    • Socioscientific issues
    • socioscientific reasoning

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The use of Cartography of Controversy within socioscientific issues-based education: students’ mapping of the badger-cattle controversy in England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this