TY - JOUR
T1 - The use of cochlear's SCAN and wireless microphones to improve speech understanding in noise with the Nucleus6® CP900 processor
AU - De Ceulaer, Geert
AU - Pascoal, David
AU - Vanpoucke, Filiep
AU - Govaerts, Paul J.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Objectives: The newest Nucleus CI processor, the CP900, has two new options to improve speech-in-noise perception: (1) use of an adaptive directional microphone (SCAN mode) and (2) wireless connection to MiniMic1 and MiniMic2 wireless remote microphones. Design: An analysis was made of the absolute and relative benefits of these technologies in a real-world mimicking test situation. Speech perception was tested using an adaptive speech-in-noise test (sentences-in-babble noise). In session A, SRTs were measured in three conditions: (1) Clinical Map, (2) SCAN and (3) MiniMic1. Each was assessed for three distances between speakers and CI recipient: 1 m, 2 m and 3 m. In session B, the benefit of the use of MiniMic2 was compared to benefit of MiniMic1 at 3 m. Study sample: A group of 13 adult CP900 recipients participated. Results: SCAN and MiniMic1 improved performance compared to the standard microphone with a median improvement in SRT of 2.7–3.9 dB for SCAN at 1 m and 3 m, respectively, and 4.7–10.9 dB for the MiniMic1. MiniMic1 improvements were significant. MiniMic2 showed an improvement in SRT of 22.2 dB compared to 10.0 dB for MiniMic1 (3 m). Conclusions: Digital wireless transmission systems (i.e. MiniMic) offer a statistically and clinically significant improvement in speech perception in challenging, realistic listening conditions.
AB - Objectives: The newest Nucleus CI processor, the CP900, has two new options to improve speech-in-noise perception: (1) use of an adaptive directional microphone (SCAN mode) and (2) wireless connection to MiniMic1 and MiniMic2 wireless remote microphones. Design: An analysis was made of the absolute and relative benefits of these technologies in a real-world mimicking test situation. Speech perception was tested using an adaptive speech-in-noise test (sentences-in-babble noise). In session A, SRTs were measured in three conditions: (1) Clinical Map, (2) SCAN and (3) MiniMic1. Each was assessed for three distances between speakers and CI recipient: 1 m, 2 m and 3 m. In session B, the benefit of the use of MiniMic2 was compared to benefit of MiniMic1 at 3 m. Study sample: A group of 13 adult CP900 recipients participated. Results: SCAN and MiniMic1 improved performance compared to the standard microphone with a median improvement in SRT of 2.7–3.9 dB for SCAN at 1 m and 3 m, respectively, and 4.7–10.9 dB for the MiniMic1. MiniMic1 improvements were significant. MiniMic2 showed an improvement in SRT of 22.2 dB compared to 10.0 dB for MiniMic1 (3 m). Conclusions: Digital wireless transmission systems (i.e. MiniMic) offer a statistically and clinically significant improvement in speech perception in challenging, realistic listening conditions.
KW - assistive listening devices
KW - Cochlear implant
KW - directional microphone
KW - noise
KW - speech perception
KW - wireless
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023207434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85023207434&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346305
DO - 10.1080/14992027.2017.1346305
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85023207434
SN - 1499-2027
VL - 56
SP - 837
EP - 843
JO - International Journal of Audiology
JF - International Journal of Audiology
IS - 11
ER -