The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study

W. G. van Kernebeek, M. L.A. de Kroon, G. J.P. Savelsbergh, H. M. Toussaint

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Adequate gross motor skills are an essential aspect of a child's healthy development. Where physical education (PE) is part of the primary school curriculum, a strong curriculum-based emphasis on evaluation and support of motor skill development in PE is apparent. Monitoring motor development is then a task for the PE teacher. To fulfill this task, teachers need adequate tools. The 4-Skills Scan is a quick and easily manageable gross motor skill instrument; however, its validity has never been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the construct and concurrent validity of both 4-Skills Scans (version 2007 and version 2015). A total of 212 primary school children (6-12 years old) was requested to participate in both versions of the 4-Skills Scan. For assessing construct validity, children covered an obstacle course with video recordings for observation by an expert panel. For concurrent validity, a comparison was made with the M-ABC-2, by calculating Pearson correlations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the contribution of each subscale to the construct of gross motor skills, according to the M-ABC-2 and the expert panel. Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and expert valuations were moderate, with coefficients of.47 (version 2007) and.46 (version 2015). Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and the M-ABC-2 (gross) were moderate (.56) for version 2007 and high (.64) for version 2015. It is concluded that both versions of the 4-Skills Scans are satisfactory valid instruments for assessing gross motor skills during PE lessons.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2349-2357
Number of pages9
JournalScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
Volume28
Issue number11
Early online date1 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Validation Studies
Physical Education and Training
Curriculum
Video Recording
Child Development
Linear Models
Regression Analysis
Observation

Keywords

  • motor skill assessment
  • physical education
  • primary school children
  • psychometrics
  • validity

Cite this

van Kernebeek, W. G. ; de Kroon, M. L.A. ; Savelsbergh, G. J.P. ; Toussaint, H. M. / The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study. In: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2018 ; Vol. 28, No. 11. pp. 2349-2357.
@article{e2992a9ce73d4f7d854abbb6ff1bf370,
title = "The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study",
abstract = "Adequate gross motor skills are an essential aspect of a child's healthy development. Where physical education (PE) is part of the primary school curriculum, a strong curriculum-based emphasis on evaluation and support of motor skill development in PE is apparent. Monitoring motor development is then a task for the PE teacher. To fulfill this task, teachers need adequate tools. The 4-Skills Scan is a quick and easily manageable gross motor skill instrument; however, its validity has never been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the construct and concurrent validity of both 4-Skills Scans (version 2007 and version 2015). A total of 212 primary school children (6-12 years old) was requested to participate in both versions of the 4-Skills Scan. For assessing construct validity, children covered an obstacle course with video recordings for observation by an expert panel. For concurrent validity, a comparison was made with the M-ABC-2, by calculating Pearson correlations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the contribution of each subscale to the construct of gross motor skills, according to the M-ABC-2 and the expert panel. Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and expert valuations were moderate, with coefficients of.47 (version 2007) and.46 (version 2015). Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and the M-ABC-2 (gross) were moderate (.56) for version 2007 and high (.64) for version 2015. It is concluded that both versions of the 4-Skills Scans are satisfactory valid instruments for assessing gross motor skills during PE lessons.",
keywords = "motor skill assessment, physical education, primary school children, psychometrics, validity",
author = "{van Kernebeek}, {W. G.} and {de Kroon}, {M. L.A.} and Savelsbergh, {G. J.P.} and Toussaint, {H. M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1111/sms.13231",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2349--2357",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports",
issn = "0905-7188",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "11",

}

The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study. / van Kernebeek, W. G.; de Kroon, M. L.A.; Savelsbergh, G. J.P.; Toussaint, H. M.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Vol. 28, No. 11, 11.2018, p. 2349-2357.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The validity of the 4-Skills Scan A double-validation study

AU - van Kernebeek, W. G.

AU - de Kroon, M. L.A.

AU - Savelsbergh, G. J.P.

AU - Toussaint, H. M.

PY - 2018/11

Y1 - 2018/11

N2 - Adequate gross motor skills are an essential aspect of a child's healthy development. Where physical education (PE) is part of the primary school curriculum, a strong curriculum-based emphasis on evaluation and support of motor skill development in PE is apparent. Monitoring motor development is then a task for the PE teacher. To fulfill this task, teachers need adequate tools. The 4-Skills Scan is a quick and easily manageable gross motor skill instrument; however, its validity has never been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the construct and concurrent validity of both 4-Skills Scans (version 2007 and version 2015). A total of 212 primary school children (6-12 years old) was requested to participate in both versions of the 4-Skills Scan. For assessing construct validity, children covered an obstacle course with video recordings for observation by an expert panel. For concurrent validity, a comparison was made with the M-ABC-2, by calculating Pearson correlations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the contribution of each subscale to the construct of gross motor skills, according to the M-ABC-2 and the expert panel. Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and expert valuations were moderate, with coefficients of.47 (version 2007) and.46 (version 2015). Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and the M-ABC-2 (gross) were moderate (.56) for version 2007 and high (.64) for version 2015. It is concluded that both versions of the 4-Skills Scans are satisfactory valid instruments for assessing gross motor skills during PE lessons.

AB - Adequate gross motor skills are an essential aspect of a child's healthy development. Where physical education (PE) is part of the primary school curriculum, a strong curriculum-based emphasis on evaluation and support of motor skill development in PE is apparent. Monitoring motor development is then a task for the PE teacher. To fulfill this task, teachers need adequate tools. The 4-Skills Scan is a quick and easily manageable gross motor skill instrument; however, its validity has never been assessed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the construct and concurrent validity of both 4-Skills Scans (version 2007 and version 2015). A total of 212 primary school children (6-12 years old) was requested to participate in both versions of the 4-Skills Scan. For assessing construct validity, children covered an obstacle course with video recordings for observation by an expert panel. For concurrent validity, a comparison was made with the M-ABC-2, by calculating Pearson correlations. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine the contribution of each subscale to the construct of gross motor skills, according to the M-ABC-2 and the expert panel. Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and expert valuations were moderate, with coefficients of.47 (version 2007) and.46 (version 2015). Correlations between the 4-Skills Scans and the M-ABC-2 (gross) were moderate (.56) for version 2007 and high (.64) for version 2015. It is concluded that both versions of the 4-Skills Scans are satisfactory valid instruments for assessing gross motor skills during PE lessons.

KW - motor skill assessment

KW - physical education

KW - primary school children

KW - psychometrics

KW - validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054776067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054776067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/sms.13231

DO - 10.1111/sms.13231

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2349

EP - 2357

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports

SN - 0905-7188

IS - 11

ER -