Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The value of understanding

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Over the last several years a number of leading philosophers - including Catherine Elgin, Linda Zagzebski, Jonathan Kvanvig, and Duncan Pritchard - have grown increasingly dissatisfied with the contemporary focus on knowledge in epistemology and have attempted to "recover" the notion of understanding. According to some of these philosophers, in fact, understanding deserves not just to be recovered, but to supplant knowledge as the focus of epistemological inquiry. This entry considers some of the main reasons why philosophers have taken understanding to be more valuable than knowledge, focusing on claims that it is more transparent, that it better reflects or mirrors the world, and that it is a greater intellectual achievement. © 2012 The Author.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-117
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The value of understanding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this