TY - JOUR
T1 - The warning stimulus as retrieval cue
T2 - The role of associative memory in temporal preparation
AU - Los, Sander A.
AU - Nieuwenstein, Jurre
AU - Bouharab, Anass
AU - Stephens, David J.
AU - Meeter, Martijn
AU - Kruijne, Wouter
PY - 2021/3
Y1 - 2021/3
N2 - In a warned reaction time task, the warning stimulus (S1) initiates a process of temporal preparation, which promotes a speeded response to the impending target stimulus (S2). According to the multiple trace theory of temporal preparation (MTP), participants learn the timing of S2 by storing a memory trace on each trial, which contains a temporal profile of the events on that trial. On each new trial, S1 serves as a retrieval cue that implicitly and associatively activates memory traces created on earlier trials, which jointly drive temporal preparation for S2. The idea that S1 assumes this role as a retrieval cue was tested across eight experiments, in which two different S1s were associated with two different distributions of S1-S2 intervals: one with predominantly short and one with predominantly long intervals. Experiments differed regarding the S1 features that made up a pair, ranging from highly distinct (e.g., tone and flash) to more similar (e.g., red and green flash) and verbal (i.e., “short” vs “long”). Exclusively for pairs of highly distinct S1s, the results showed that the S1 cue modified temporal preparation, even in participants who showed no awareness of the contingency. This cueing effect persisted in a subsequent transfer phase, in which the contingency between S1 and the timing of S2 was broken – a fact participants were informed of in advance. Together, these findings support the role of S1 as an implicit retrieval cue, consistent with MTP.
AB - In a warned reaction time task, the warning stimulus (S1) initiates a process of temporal preparation, which promotes a speeded response to the impending target stimulus (S2). According to the multiple trace theory of temporal preparation (MTP), participants learn the timing of S2 by storing a memory trace on each trial, which contains a temporal profile of the events on that trial. On each new trial, S1 serves as a retrieval cue that implicitly and associatively activates memory traces created on earlier trials, which jointly drive temporal preparation for S2. The idea that S1 assumes this role as a retrieval cue was tested across eight experiments, in which two different S1s were associated with two different distributions of S1-S2 intervals: one with predominantly short and one with predominantly long intervals. Experiments differed regarding the S1 features that made up a pair, ranging from highly distinct (e.g., tone and flash) to more similar (e.g., red and green flash) and verbal (i.e., “short” vs “long”). Exclusively for pairs of highly distinct S1s, the results showed that the S1 cue modified temporal preparation, even in participants who showed no awareness of the contingency. This cueing effect persisted in a subsequent transfer phase, in which the contingency between S1 and the timing of S2 was broken – a fact participants were informed of in advance. Together, these findings support the role of S1 as an implicit retrieval cue, consistent with MTP.
KW - Associative learning
KW - Long-term memory
KW - Temporal orienting
KW - Temporal preparation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100037714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100037714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101378
DO - 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101378
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100037714
SN - 0010-0285
VL - 125
SP - 1
EP - 23
JO - Cognitive Psychology
JF - Cognitive Psychology
M1 - 101378
ER -