Theorising and illustrating the collaborative practices of plural policing: An analysis of three cases in the Netherlands and Belgium

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents theoretical and empirical research on the collaborative practices of plural policing in the Netherlands and Belgium. It develops and operationalises an explanatory theoretical framework which consists of three factors: network ‘structure and technologies’, ‘culture and relationships’ and ‘governance and policy’. A qualitative analysis of three cases – the Johan Cruijff Arena (the Ajax soccer stadium in Amsterdam), the Nijmegen Four-Day March (a major walking event in the East of the Netherlands) and the Antwerp Diamond Quarter – illustrates that ‘structure and technologies’ and ‘culture and relationships’ are intertwined factors. The lack of a formalised structure for collaboration coincides with lower levels of mutual trust, which, in turn, disturbs the equilibrium that exists between interdependent actors. The state remains salient in anchoring the local security networks studied. Although private actors can act as governing nodes, they only prosper within the remit of government power and public legal authority.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)21-36
Number of pages16
JournalInternational journal of comparative and applied criminal justice
Volume47
Issue number1
Early online date12 Aug 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Funding

This research was supported by the Research and Documentation Centre (Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum; WODC) of the Dutch Ministry of Justice. I wish to thank Rozetta Meijer for her assistance in conducting the research.

FundersFunder number
Dutch Ministry of Justice
Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Theorising and illustrating the collaborative practices of plural policing: An analysis of three cases in the Netherlands and Belgium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this