Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression

E. Driessen; H.L. Van; J. Peen; F.J. Don; S. Kool; D. Westra; M. Hendriksen; P. Cuijpers; J.W.R. Twisk; J.J.M. Dekker

doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023

Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression

E. Driessen
, H.L. Van
, J. Peen
, F.J. Don
, S. Kool
, D. Westra
, M. Hendriksen
, P. Cuijpers
, J.W.R. Twisk
, J.J.M. Dekker

Clinical Psychology

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Background The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) for depression is debated due to a paucity of high-quality studies. We compared short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized clinical trial. We used therapist-rated outcomes to examine how the course of change during treatment could be best represented and to compare treatment efficacy, hypothesizing non-significant differences.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	112-118
Journal	Journal of Affective Disorders
Volume	170
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023
Publication status	Published - 2015

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

Driessen, E., Van, H. L., Peen, J., Don, F. J., Kool, S., Westra, D., Hendriksen, M., Cuijpers, P., Twisk, J. W. R., & Dekker, J. J. M. (2015). Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 170, 112-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023

@article{57739a2c62a243319013c293c49731c0,

title = "Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression",

abstract = "Background The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) for depression is debated due to a paucity of high-quality studies. We compared short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized clinical trial. We used therapist-rated outcomes to examine how the course of change during treatment could be best represented and to compare treatment efficacy, hypothesizing non-significant differences.",

author = "E. Driessen and H.L. Van and J. Peen and F.J. Don and S. Kool and D. Westra and M. Hendriksen and P. Cuijpers and J.W.R. Twisk and J.J.M. Dekker",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023",

language = "English",

volume = "170",

pages = "112--118",

journal = "Journal of Affective Disorders",

issn = "0165-0327",

publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression

AU - Driessen, E.

AU - Van, H.L.

AU - Peen, J.

AU - Don, F.J.

AU - Kool, S.

AU - Westra, D.

AU - Hendriksen, M.

AU - Cuijpers, P.

AU - Twisk, J.W.R.

AU - Dekker, J.J.M.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Background The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) for depression is debated due to a paucity of high-quality studies. We compared short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized clinical trial. We used therapist-rated outcomes to examine how the course of change during treatment could be best represented and to compare treatment efficacy, hypothesizing non-significant differences.

AB - Background The efficacy of psychodynamic therapy (PDT) for depression is debated due to a paucity of high-quality studies. We compared short psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in a randomized clinical trial. We used therapist-rated outcomes to examine how the course of change during treatment could be best represented and to compare treatment efficacy, hypothesizing non-significant differences.

U2 - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jad.2014.08.023

M3 - Article

SN - 0165-0327

VL - 170

SP - 112

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Affective Disorders

JF - Journal of Affective Disorders

ER -

Therapist-rated outcomes in a randomized clinical trial comparing cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy for major depression

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Fingerprint

Cite this