Abstract
This article takes a practice theory approach to explore the little-known history of the Dutch government practices that, between the early 1920s and mid 1970s, preceded explicit Dutch international cultural policy in organizing the promotion of the Dutch arts abroad. Advancing from an understanding of international cultural policy as a ‘hybrid’ (socio-material) practice of meaning production, it examines how those government agencies defined ‘Dutchness’ and ‘design’, and how the specificities of the things being promoted influenced those definitions. From this detailed empirical study, I propose a theorization of the relationship between policy, practices, and things as relational, meaning the understanding of things and policy as both shaping – and being shaped by – practices of international promotion. This theorization has broader relevance to cultural policy research since it suggests that policies and practices promoting different domains of culture may develop differently depending on the specificities of the artefacts that they seek to disseminate, and vice-versa.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 946-961 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | International Journal of Cultural Policy |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 29 Jul 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Funding
This publication is part of the project A Socio-Cultural History of Dutch Design, 1945-2010 with project number [017.008.090] of the research programme Mozaïek which is (partly) financed by the Dutch Research Council (NWO). I would like to thank Jan Warndorff for his tirelessly critical questions and helpful suggestions; Roosmarijn Hompe for her generous sharing of expertise and time; and the two anonymous reviewers for their probing comments and insightful recommendations. While they have all contributed to a better article, its faults remain all mine.
| Funders |
|---|
| Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek |
Keywords
- Dutch design promotion
- Dutch international cultural policy
- Dutch national identity
- practice theory
- relationality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Things, practices & policies: relationality and the early stages of the international promotion of Dutch design, 1920s–1970s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver