TY - JOUR
T1 - Timing a week later
T2 - The role of long-term memory in temporal preparation
AU - Mattiesing, Rozemarijn M.
AU - Kruijne, Wouter
AU - Meeter, Martijn
AU - Los, Sander A.
PY - 2017/12
Y1 - 2017/12
N2 - Temporal preparation has been investigated extensively by manipulating the foreperiod, the interval between a warning stimulus and target stimulus requiring a speeded response. Although such research has revealed many effects of both the duration and distribution of foreperiods on reaction times, the underlying cognitive mechanism is still largely unknown. Here, we test a recent proposal that temporal preparation is driven by the retrieval of memory traces of past experiences from long-term memory rather than by knowledge about upcoming events. Two groups of participants received different foreperiod distributions in an acquisition phase, which was followed a week later by a transfer phase, in which both groups received the same distribution of foreperiods. We found that the effects of the different foreperiod distributions presented in the acquisition phase were still apparent a week later during the transfer phase, as the reaction time patterns of both groups reflected the old distributions. This occurred even though both groups were provided with full information about the change in the distribution of foreperiods at the start of the transfer phase. These findings provide compelling evidence that long-term memory plays an important role in temporal preparation.
AB - Temporal preparation has been investigated extensively by manipulating the foreperiod, the interval between a warning stimulus and target stimulus requiring a speeded response. Although such research has revealed many effects of both the duration and distribution of foreperiods on reaction times, the underlying cognitive mechanism is still largely unknown. Here, we test a recent proposal that temporal preparation is driven by the retrieval of memory traces of past experiences from long-term memory rather than by knowledge about upcoming events. Two groups of participants received different foreperiod distributions in an acquisition phase, which was followed a week later by a transfer phase, in which both groups received the same distribution of foreperiods. We found that the effects of the different foreperiod distributions presented in the acquisition phase were still apparent a week later during the transfer phase, as the reaction time patterns of both groups reflected the old distributions. This occurred even though both groups were provided with full information about the change in the distribution of foreperiods at the start of the transfer phase. These findings provide compelling evidence that long-term memory plays an important role in temporal preparation.
KW - Hazard
KW - Long-term memory
KW - Multiple trace theory
KW - Temporal preparation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018798847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018798847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13423-017-1270-3
DO - 10.3758/s13423-017-1270-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85018798847
SN - 1069-9384
VL - 24
SP - 1900
EP - 1905
JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review
IS - 6
ER -