Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0—Evaluation of diagnostic reliability in the assessment of signs and symptoms for tooth wear by non-experts

Jakob C. Roehl*, Lukasz Katzer, Holger A. Jakstat, Peter Wetselaar, M. Oliver Ahlers

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Tooth wear is a multifactorial condition that manifests through various signs and symptoms. These individual signs and symptoms were described in multiple studies, leading to the inclusion in TWES 2.0 (Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0) and the forthcoming DC-TW (Diagnostic Criteria for Tooth Wear). However, a study evaluating their reliability has yet to be conducted. Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the reliability in the assessment of 6 signs of pathological tooth wear and 18 clinical signs and symptoms determining aetiology, all of which are included in the TWES 2.0/DC-TW. Methods: 48 dental students (operators) evaluated patient cases from a patient pool of 14 patients on dental casts and high-resolution intraoral photographs. The agreement between all operators for each sign and symptom was calculated based on ICC (Intraclass Correlation Coefficients). Additionally, the agreement of each operator's evaluation with a predefined sample solution was calculated based on Cohen's kappa. Results: Inter-user agreement ranged from near perfect (0.91) to poor (0.02) for the various pathology signs or aetiology symptoms of tooth wear (mean 0.32). The agreements of the operator's ratings compared to the sample solution resulted in Cohen's kappa from 0.18 to 1 (mean 0.59) for the pathology signs and ranged from 0.02 to 0.51 for the aetiology signs (mean 0.38). Conclusions: The reliability of the signs and symptoms examined and the ability of individual investigators to correctly identify and assign signs and symptoms varied widely. The current assessment tools for the qualification of tooth wear need further refinement, and examiners need intensive training in tooth wear assessment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)712-723
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
Volume51
Issue number4
Early online date13 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the participating dental students from the University of Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, for their voluntary participation in the study. In addition, we would like to thank the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, which supported the conduct of the study by providing the necessary rooms, especially Professor Dr. Udo Schumacher and Ms. Ursula Makowski, Institute of Anatomy and Professor Dr. Kai Rothkamm, Center for Oncology. We especially thank Dr. Kai Becker for supporting the study’s conception and organisation. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

FundersFunder number
Universität Hamburg
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

    Keywords

    • assessment tools
    • diagnosis
    • qualification
    • reliability
    • tooth wear
    • tooth wear evaluation system

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tooth Wear Evaluation System 2.0—Evaluation of diagnostic reliability in the assessment of signs and symptoms for tooth wear by non-experts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this