TY - GEN
T1 - Toward a Quality Model for Hybrid Intelligence Teams
AU - Dell'Anna, Davide
AU - Murukannaiah, Pradeep K.
AU - Dudzik, Bernd
AU - Grossi, Davide
AU - Jonker, Catholijn M.
AU - Oertel, Catharine
AU - Yolum, Pınar
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Hybrid Intelligence (HI) is an emerging paradigm in which artificial intelligence (AI) augments human intelligence. The current literature lacks systematic models that guide the design and evaluation of HI systems. Further, discussions around HI primarily focus on technology, neglecting the holistic human-AI ensemble. In this paper, we take the initial steps toward the development of a quality model for characterizing and evaluating HI systems from a human-AI teams perspective. We conducted a study investigating the adequacy of properties commonly associated with effective human teams to describe HI. Our study, featuring the insights of 50 HI researchers, shows that various human team properties, including boundedness, interdependence, competency, purposefulness, initiative, normativity, and effectiveness, are important for HI systems. Our study also reveals limitations in applying certain human team properties, such as coaching, rewards, and recognition, to HI systems due to the inherent human-AI asymmetry.
AB - Hybrid Intelligence (HI) is an emerging paradigm in which artificial intelligence (AI) augments human intelligence. The current literature lacks systematic models that guide the design and evaluation of HI systems. Further, discussions around HI primarily focus on technology, neglecting the holistic human-AI ensemble. In this paper, we take the initial steps toward the development of a quality model for characterizing and evaluating HI systems from a human-AI teams perspective. We conducted a study investigating the adequacy of properties commonly associated with effective human teams to describe HI. Our study, featuring the insights of 50 HI researchers, shows that various human team properties, including boundedness, interdependence, competency, purposefulness, initiative, normativity, and effectiveness, are important for HI systems. Our study also reveals limitations in applying certain human team properties, such as coaching, rewards, and recognition, to HI systems due to the inherent human-AI asymmetry.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196358874
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85196358874#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.5555/3635637.3662893
DO - 10.5555/3635637.3662893
M3 - Conference contribution
T3 - Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS
SP - 434
EP - 443
BT - AAMAS 2024
PB - ACM Digital Library
T2 - 23rd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2024
Y2 - 6 May 2024 through 10 May 2024
ER -