Abstract
This article proposes to bring the sustainable product-service innovation (PSI) field into a next phase—after two phases of exploring why and how firms achieve sustainable PSI growth, we suggest to further focus on finding when they actually do so. Based on prior studies, we pinpoint and describe two main shortcomings in the current body of PSI literature: (1) an overemphasis on the firm level, and (2) an overuse of descriptive case studies. These shortcomings are used as step-ping-stones for formulating a research approach that integrates Multiple Levels (namely, the firm, its environment, and its people), mixes different Methods (both qualitative and quantitative) and that turns researchers to Action (through advice and training). This MLMA approach offers ample new research opportunities and turns the servitization research community into a servitized community by leveraging academic insights to better support firms in improving their economic and environmental performance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 8422 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-21 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Sustainability |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 15 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 Jul 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgments: The first author is grateful for the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71874152, 71732008, 71572187), the National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (Grant No. 21AZD010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities during his time as postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Intellectual Property Management (IIPM) at the School of Management at Zhejiang University (ZJU) in Hangzhou, P.R. China.
Funding Information:
The first author is grateful for the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71874152, 71732008, 71572187), the National Office forPhilosophy and Social Sciences (Grant No. 21AZD010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities during his time as postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Intellectual Property Management (IIPM) at the School of Management at Zhejiang University (ZJU) in Hangzhou, P.R. China.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
Acknowledgments: The first author is grateful for the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71874152, 71732008, 71572187), the National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (Grant No. 21AZD010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities during his time as postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Intellectual Property Management (IIPM) at the School of Management at Zhejiang University (ZJU) in Hangzhou, P.R. China. The first author is grateful for the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71874152, 71732008, 71572187), the National Office forPhilosophy and Social Sciences (Grant No. 21AZD010) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities during his time as postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Intellectual Property Management (IIPM) at the School of Management at Zhejiang University (ZJU) in Hangzhou, P.R. China.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
National Office forPhilosophy and Social Sciences | |
National Natural Science Foundation of China | 71874152, 71572187, 71732008 |
Zhejiang University | |
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities | |
National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences | 21AZD010 |
Keywords
- Action research
- Mixed methods
- Multiple levels
- Product-service innovation
- Theory integration