Abstract
This opinion piece aims to inform future research funding programs on responsible research practices (RRP) based on three specific objectives: (1) to give a sketch of the current international discussion on responsible research practices (RRPs); (2) to give an overview of current initiatives and already obtained results regarding RRP; and (3) to give an overview of potential future needs for research on RRP. In this opinion piece, we have used seven iterative methodological steps (including literature review, ranking, and sorting exercises) to create the proposed research agenda. We identified six main themes that we believe need attention in future research: (1) responsible evaluation of research and researchers, (2) the influence of open science and transparency on RRP, (3) research on responsible mentoring, supervision, and role modeling, (4) the effect of education and training on RRP, (5) checking for reproducibility, and (6) responsible and fair peer review. These themes have in common that they address aspects of research that are mostly on the level of the scientific system, more than on the level of the individual researcher. Some current initiatives are already gathering substantial empirical evidence to start filling these gaps. We believe that with sufficient support from all relevant stakeholders, more progress can be made.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 450-460 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics |
Volume | 16 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 26 May 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw (grant number not applicable).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
The authors thank the experts Fenneke Blom, Lex Bouter, Chris Chambers, Roel Freriks, Sonja Jerak-Zuiderent, Jean Philippe de Jong, Padmini Khedoe, Dani?l Lakens, Ana Marusic, Lucille Mattijssen, Frank Miedema, David Moher, Peter Novitzky, Sarah de Rijcke, Jeroen de Ridder, Simine Vazire, and Eric-Jan Wagenmakers who have provided us with valuable feedback that has significantly improved this manuscript. The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw (grant number not applicable).
Keywords
- authorship
- conflicts of interest/bias
- educational research
- questionable research practices
- research agenda
- research ethics
- research integrity
- responsible research practices