Abstract
It is maintained that in contradistinction to the natural sciences, in psychology (and other human sciences) ‘history is not past tense’. This is borne out by the contemporary relevance of a specific part of the history of psychology, which focuses on the internal-theoretical significance of history for the conceptual ‘household’ of the discipline. From this perspective, several issues in the Danziger-Van Rappard-Dehue debate are addressed. © 1998, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 663-668 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Theory and Psychology |
| Volume | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1998 |
