Towards parliamentarization of foreign and security policy?

W.M. Wagner, T. Raunio

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

It is customary to argue that foreign policy is very much dominated by the executive, with parliaments wielding limited influence. However, with the exception of the US Congress, legislative‒executive relations in the realm of foreign and security policy have attracted remarkably little scholarly attention. Drawing on a principal‒agent framework, this collection scrutinises the conventional wisdom of ‘executive autonomy’ in foreign affairs, indicating that even though parliaments have arguably become more involved in foreign and security policy over time, any notions of parliamentarisation need to be treated with caution. While expectations of consensus in the name of the national interest continue to play an important role in foreign policy decision-making, the papers highlight the role of party-political contestation structuring parliamentary debates and votes in this increasingly politicised issue area. This introductory paper introduces the analytical framework and hypotheses guiding the contributions in this collection, summarises their main findings and suggests avenues for future research.
Original languageEnglish
Article number1
Number of pages19
JournalWest European Politics
Volume40
Issue number1
Early online date7 Nov 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

security policy
foreign policy
parliament
parliamentary debate
wisdom
voter
autonomy
decision making

Cite this

@article{0094d6958f7540fcbb6c3767953f332e,
title = "Towards parliamentarization of foreign and security policy?",
abstract = "It is customary to argue that foreign policy is very much dominated by the executive, with parliaments wielding limited influence. However, with the exception of the US Congress, legislative‒executive relations in the realm of foreign and security policy have attracted remarkably little scholarly attention. Drawing on a principal‒agent framework, this collection scrutinises the conventional wisdom of ‘executive autonomy’ in foreign affairs, indicating that even though parliaments have arguably become more involved in foreign and security policy over time, any notions of parliamentarisation need to be treated with caution. While expectations of consensus in the name of the national interest continue to play an important role in foreign policy decision-making, the papers highlight the role of party-political contestation structuring parliamentary debates and votes in this increasingly politicised issue area. This introductory paper introduces the analytical framework and hypotheses guiding the contributions in this collection, summarises their main findings and suggests avenues for future research.",
author = "W.M. Wagner and T. Raunio",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/01402382.2016.1240411",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
journal = "West European Politics",
issn = "0140-2382",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Towards parliamentarization of foreign and security policy? / Wagner, W.M.; Raunio, T.

In: West European Politics, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards parliamentarization of foreign and security policy?

AU - Wagner, W.M.

AU - Raunio, T.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - It is customary to argue that foreign policy is very much dominated by the executive, with parliaments wielding limited influence. However, with the exception of the US Congress, legislative‒executive relations in the realm of foreign and security policy have attracted remarkably little scholarly attention. Drawing on a principal‒agent framework, this collection scrutinises the conventional wisdom of ‘executive autonomy’ in foreign affairs, indicating that even though parliaments have arguably become more involved in foreign and security policy over time, any notions of parliamentarisation need to be treated with caution. While expectations of consensus in the name of the national interest continue to play an important role in foreign policy decision-making, the papers highlight the role of party-political contestation structuring parliamentary debates and votes in this increasingly politicised issue area. This introductory paper introduces the analytical framework and hypotheses guiding the contributions in this collection, summarises their main findings and suggests avenues for future research.

AB - It is customary to argue that foreign policy is very much dominated by the executive, with parliaments wielding limited influence. However, with the exception of the US Congress, legislative‒executive relations in the realm of foreign and security policy have attracted remarkably little scholarly attention. Drawing on a principal‒agent framework, this collection scrutinises the conventional wisdom of ‘executive autonomy’ in foreign affairs, indicating that even though parliaments have arguably become more involved in foreign and security policy over time, any notions of parliamentarisation need to be treated with caution. While expectations of consensus in the name of the national interest continue to play an important role in foreign policy decision-making, the papers highlight the role of party-political contestation structuring parliamentary debates and votes in this increasingly politicised issue area. This introductory paper introduces the analytical framework and hypotheses guiding the contributions in this collection, summarises their main findings and suggests avenues for future research.

U2 - 10.1080/01402382.2016.1240411

DO - 10.1080/01402382.2016.1240411

M3 - Article

VL - 40

JO - West European Politics

JF - West European Politics

SN - 0140-2382

IS - 1

M1 - 1

ER -