Toxicokinetics of silver nanoparticles in the mealworm Tenebrio molitor exposed via soil or food

Zahra Khodaparast, Cornelis A.M. van Gestel, Anastasios G. Papadiamantis, Sandra F. Gonçalves, Iseult Lynch, Susana Loureiro*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) may reach the soil compartment via sewage sludge or nanoagrochemical applications. Understanding how NPs interact with biological systems is crucial for an accurate hazard assessment. Therefore, this study aimed at determining the Ag toxicokinetics in the mealworm Tenebrio molitor, exposed via Lufa 2.2 soil or via food to different Ag forms (uncoated 50 nm AgNPs, paraffin coated 3–8 nm and PVP-stabilised 60 nm, Ag2S NPs 20 nm, and ionic Ag). Mealworms were exposed for 21 days followed by a 21-day elimination phase (clean soil/food). A one-compartment kinetics model with inert fraction (simulating a storage compartment, where detoxified forms are located) was used to describe Ag accumulation. Fully understanding the uptake route in mealworms is difficult. For that reason several approaches were used, showing that food, soil and pore water all are valid uptake routes, but with different importance. Silver taken up from soil pore water or from soil showed to be related to Ag dissolution in soil pore water. In general, the uptake and elimination rate constants were similar for 3–8 nm and 60 nm AgNPs and for AgNO3, but significantly different for the uncoated 50 nm AgNPs. Upon food exposure, uptake rate constants were similar for 50 nm AgNPs and AgNO3, while those for 60 nm and 3–8 nm AgNPs and for Ag2S NPs also grouped together. NP exposure in soil appeared more difficult to characterize, with different patterns obtained for the different NPs. But it was evident that upon soil or food exposure, particle characteristics highly affected Ag bioavailability and bioaccumulation. Although Ag2S NPs were taken up, their elimination was faster than for other Ag forms, showing the lowest inert fraction. The significantly different elimination rate constants suggest that the mechanism of elimination may not be the same for different AgNPs either.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number146071
    Pages (from-to)1-14
    Number of pages14
    JournalScience of the Total Environment
    Volume777
    Early online date26 Feb 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 10 Jul 2021

    Bibliographical note

    Publisher Copyright:
    © 2021 The Authors

    Copyright:
    Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Funding

    This work was supported by the project NanoFASE (Nanomaterial Fate and Speciation in the Environment), financed by the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 646002 (including ZK doctoral grant BD/UI88/7260/2015 ). Thanks are also due to FCT / MCTES for the financial support ( UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020 ) through national funds. AGP would like to acknowledge support from the H2020 EU research infrastructure for nanosafety project NanoCommons (Grant Agreement No. 731032 ) and the POST-DOC/0718/0070 project , co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund and the Republic of Cyprus through the Research and Innovation Foundation . The authors would like to thank Rudo A. Verweij for chemical analyses.

    FundersFunder number
    Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
    UIDP/50017/2020+UIDB/50017/2020
    Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
    Not added731032
    Horizon 2020646002, BD/UI88/7260/2015

      Keywords

      • Ag dissolution
      • Bioaccumulation
      • Bioavailability
      • Exposure route
      • Silver sulfide nanoparticles

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Toxicokinetics of silver nanoparticles in the mealworm Tenebrio molitor exposed via soil or food'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this