Abstract
The academic literature on trade-offs in ecosystem management has paid relatively little attention to justice and poverty reduction objectives. The aim of this paper is to highlight the multiple dimensions of trade-offs in ecosystem services management for poverty alleviation, and to support decision-makers in planning for the almost inevitable trade-offs arising from environmental interventions. The paper brings together different dimensions or lenses through which to analyse trade-offs in ecosystem management for poverty alleviation in a low-income country context. Following a literature review of trade-off decisions, the paper introduces the Balance Sheets Approach to structure trade-off analysis and appraise decisions. We apply the Balance Sheets Approach to analyse five case studies set in very different social-ecological systems where trade-offs were pertinent and undermined poverty alleviation. We show how the combination of ‘positive’ approaches, often used at strategic level, with ‘value’ approaches which analyse multiple values, multi-scale governance, power and capacity, is necessary to analyse complex trade-offs. Based on the case studies we identify four lessons for future trade-off analysis in the context of ecosystem management for poverty alleviation in low-income settings.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 107103 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Ecological Economics |
| Volume | 187 |
| Early online date | 25 May 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 The Authors
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Funding
MS was funded by the project ‘A framework for individual and shared preferences for ecosystem services trade-offs’ (grant number: FELL-2014-104 ) of the United Kingdom's Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme. The ESPA programme was funded by the Department for International Development (DFID) , the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) , and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) . AG acknowledges the support of the ESPA project ‘Unraveling biofuel impacts on ecosystem services, human wellbeing and poverty alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa’ (grant number: NE/L001373/1 ) and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) for the Belmont Forum project FICESSA . KS acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ‘Attaining Sustainable Services from Ecosystems using Trade-off Scenarios’ (grant number: NE-J002267-1 ). NGC was supported by the European Research Council (Grant No. GA 206994 REDIRECT). CH acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ‘Assessing Health, Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation in Populous Deltas’ (grant number: NE-J002755-1 ). MS was funded by the project ?A framework for individual and shared preferences for ecosystem services trade-offs? (grant number: FELL-2014-104) of the United Kingdom's Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme. The ESPA programme was funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). FE was supported by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant number 680176; SCALEFORES). AG acknowledges the support of the ESPA project ?Unraveling biofuel impacts on ecosystem services, human wellbeing and poverty alleviation in Sub-Saharan Africa? (grant number: NE/L001373/1) and the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) for the Belmont Forum project FICESSA. NGC was supported by the European Research Council (Grant No. GA 206994 REDIRECT). CH acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ?Assessing Health, Livelihoods, Ecosystem Services and Poverty Alleviation in Populous Deltas? (grant number: NE-J002755-1). FN acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ?Swahili Seas? (grant number: NE/I003401/1), ?Coastal Ecosystem Services in East Africa? (CESEA) (grant number: NE/L001535/1) and ?Analysing the multi-level governance of renewable natural resources? (grant number: ESPA/ROF/2016-17/02). KS acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ?Attaining Sustainable Services from Ecosystems using Trade-off Scenarios? (grant number: NE-J002267-1). FN acknowledges funding from the ESPA project ‘Swahili Seas’ (grant number: NE/I003401/1 ), ‘Coastal Ecosystem Services in East Africa’ (CESEA) (grant number: NE/L001535/1 ) and ‘ Analysing the multi-level governance of renewable natural resources ’ (grant number: ESPA/ROF/2016-17/02 ).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Economic and Social Research Council | |
| United Kingdom's Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation | |
| European Commission | |
| Department for International Development, UK Government | |
| ESPA | |
| Natural Environment Research Council | NE/J002755/1, NE/I003401/1, NE/L001535/1, NE/J002267/1, NE/L001373/1 |
| European Research Council | 206994 |
| Horizon 2020 | NE/L001373/1 |
| Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | 680176 |
| CESEA | ESPA/ROF/2016-17/02 |
| Japan Science and Technology Agency | GA 206994 |
Keywords
- Ecosystem services
- Governance
- Pluralism
- Poverty
- Trade-offs