Train commuters' scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

We study the trip scheduling preferences of train commuters in a real-life setting. The underlying data have been collected during large-scale peak avoidance experiment conducted in the Netherlands, in which participants could earn monetary rewards for traveling outside peak hours. The experiment included ca. 1000 participants and lasted for multiple months. Holders of an annual train pass were invited to join the experiment, and a customized smartphone app was used to measure the travel behavior of the participants. We find that compared to the pre-measurement, the relative share of peak trips decreased by 22% during the reward period, and by 10% during the post-measurement. By combining multiple complementary data sources, we are able to specify and estimate (MNL and panel latent class) departure time choice models. These yield plausible estimates for the monetary values that participants attach to reducing travel time, schedule delays, the number of transfers, crowdedness, and unreliability.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)314-333
Number of pages19
JournalTransportation Research. Part B: Methodological
Volume83
Issue numberJanuary
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

commuter
scheduling
Scheduling
experiment
evidence
reward
Experiments
Smartphones
Travel time
Application programs
travel behavior
Netherlands
travel
time

Cite this

@article{2c21920bcb554ee487d5e6046771ad8b,
title = "Train commuters' scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment",
abstract = "We study the trip scheduling preferences of train commuters in a real-life setting. The underlying data have been collected during large-scale peak avoidance experiment conducted in the Netherlands, in which participants could earn monetary rewards for traveling outside peak hours. The experiment included ca. 1000 participants and lasted for multiple months. Holders of an annual train pass were invited to join the experiment, and a customized smartphone app was used to measure the travel behavior of the participants. We find that compared to the pre-measurement, the relative share of peak trips decreased by 22{\%} during the reward period, and by 10{\%} during the post-measurement. By combining multiple complementary data sources, we are able to specify and estimate (MNL and panel latent class) departure time choice models. These yield plausible estimates for the monetary values that participants attach to reducing travel time, schedule delays, the number of transfers, crowdedness, and unreliability.",
author = "S. Peer and J.S.A. Knockaert and E.T. Verhoef",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.017",
language = "English",
volume = "83",
pages = "314--333",
journal = "Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological",
issn = "0191-2615",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "January",

}

Train commuters' scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment. / Peer, S.; Knockaert, J.S.A.; Verhoef, E.T.

In: Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, Vol. 83, No. January, 2016, p. 314-333.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Train commuters' scheduling preferences: Evidence from a large-scale peak avoidance experiment

AU - Peer, S.

AU - Knockaert, J.S.A.

AU - Verhoef, E.T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - We study the trip scheduling preferences of train commuters in a real-life setting. The underlying data have been collected during large-scale peak avoidance experiment conducted in the Netherlands, in which participants could earn monetary rewards for traveling outside peak hours. The experiment included ca. 1000 participants and lasted for multiple months. Holders of an annual train pass were invited to join the experiment, and a customized smartphone app was used to measure the travel behavior of the participants. We find that compared to the pre-measurement, the relative share of peak trips decreased by 22% during the reward period, and by 10% during the post-measurement. By combining multiple complementary data sources, we are able to specify and estimate (MNL and panel latent class) departure time choice models. These yield plausible estimates for the monetary values that participants attach to reducing travel time, schedule delays, the number of transfers, crowdedness, and unreliability.

AB - We study the trip scheduling preferences of train commuters in a real-life setting. The underlying data have been collected during large-scale peak avoidance experiment conducted in the Netherlands, in which participants could earn monetary rewards for traveling outside peak hours. The experiment included ca. 1000 participants and lasted for multiple months. Holders of an annual train pass were invited to join the experiment, and a customized smartphone app was used to measure the travel behavior of the participants. We find that compared to the pre-measurement, the relative share of peak trips decreased by 22% during the reward period, and by 10% during the post-measurement. By combining multiple complementary data sources, we are able to specify and estimate (MNL and panel latent class) departure time choice models. These yield plausible estimates for the monetary values that participants attach to reducing travel time, schedule delays, the number of transfers, crowdedness, and unreliability.

U2 - 10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.017

DO - 10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.017

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 314

EP - 333

JO - Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological

JF - Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological

SN - 0191-2615

IS - January

ER -