TY - GEN
T1 - Translating engineering workflow models to devs for performance evaluation
AU - Dávid, István
AU - Vangheluwe, Hans
AU - Van Tendeloo, Yentl
PY - 2019/1/31
Y1 - 2019/1/31
N2 - Engineering workflow models are frequently used to optimize an engineering endeavor for some well-defined performance metrics, such as time-to-market or monetary costs. Static workflow analysis is often insufficient due to the complex interleavings of different activities and the interplay with limited resources. Simulation-based techniques provide a feasible alternative to static analysis. In this paper, we provide an automated translation from engineering workflow models to DEVS (Discrete Event System Specification) models, useful for simulation and subsequent performance evaluation. Our translation supports the vast majority of the essential workflow control patterns, previously identified by van der Aalst et al. Thanks to the use of simulation, our approach is able to deal with stochastically varying activity execution times and workflow decisions, potentially evolving between subsequent iterations of the workflow. Our approach is implemented in the Modelverse, where the mapping to and simulation of DEVS models remains completely hidden from the process modeler.
AB - Engineering workflow models are frequently used to optimize an engineering endeavor for some well-defined performance metrics, such as time-to-market or monetary costs. Static workflow analysis is often insufficient due to the complex interleavings of different activities and the interplay with limited resources. Simulation-based techniques provide a feasible alternative to static analysis. In this paper, we provide an automated translation from engineering workflow models to DEVS (Discrete Event System Specification) models, useful for simulation and subsequent performance evaluation. Our translation supports the vast majority of the essential workflow control patterns, previously identified by van der Aalst et al. Thanks to the use of simulation, our approach is able to deal with stochastically varying activity execution times and workflow decisions, potentially evolving between subsequent iterations of the workflow. Our approach is implemented in the Modelverse, where the mapping to and simulation of DEVS models remains completely hidden from the process modeler.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062629207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062629207&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/WSC.2018.8632470
DO - 10.1109/WSC.2018.8632470
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85062629207
T3 - Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference
SP - 616
EP - 627
BT - WSC 2018 - 2018 Winter Simulation Conference
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2018 Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 2018
Y2 - 9 December 2018 through 12 December 2018
ER -