Treatment Alliance: A Bridge over the Religiosity Gap?

Joke C. van Nieuw Amerongen-Meeuse*, Anke I. Liefbroer, Hanneke Schaap-Jonker, Arjan W. Braam

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Many mental health care patients, regardless of their religious beliefs, prefer a similar outlook on life with their professional caregivers. Patients experience greater openness to discuss religion and spirituality (R/S), mutual understanding, less fear of disapproval and report a higher treatment alliance. The question is whether the core problem of a so-called ‘religiosity gap’ (RG) lies in (a) an objective difference in outlook on life, (b) a perceived difference in outlook on life or (c) in unmet R/S care needs. We explored this by matching data of 55 patients with their respective caregivers for a quantitative analysis. An actual (objective) RG, when patients were religious and caregivers not, was not associated with a lower treatment alliance but a difference in intrinsic religiosity, especially when caregivers scored higher than patients, was related to a lower treatment alliance. A subjective RG, perceived by patients, and a higher level of unmet R/S care needs were also significantly associated with a lower treatment alliance as rated by patients. These results emphasize that sensitivity, respect and openness regarding R/S and secular views are essential elements in treatment and might benefit the treatment relationship.

Original languageEnglish
Article number773
Pages (from-to)1-14
Number of pages14
JournalReligions
Volume15
Issue number7
Early online date26 Jun 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 by the authors.

Keywords

  • care needs
  • mental health care
  • religiosity gap
  • treatment alliance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatment Alliance: A Bridge over the Religiosity Gap?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this