Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis

D.P. Balliet, P. A. M. van Lange

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a conflict of interests. However, it is not clear how trust relates to behavior across situations that differ in the degree of conflicting interest: Does trust matter more when the conflict of interest is small or large According to an interdependence perspective, trust becomes an especially important determinant of behavior in situations involving larger, compared to smaller, degrees of conflicting interests. To examine this perspective, we conducted a meta-analysis involving 212 effect sizes on the relation between trust (both state and dispositional trust in others) and cooperation in social dilemmas-situations that involve varying degrees of conflict between self-interest and collective interest. Results revealed that the positive relation between trust and cooperation is stronger when there is a larger, compared to smaller, degree of conflict. We also examined several other possible moderators of the relation between trust and cooperation. The relation between trust and cooperation was stronger during individual, compared to intergroup, interactions but did not vary as a function of the situation being either a one-shot or repeated interaction. We also find differences across countries in the extent that people condition their own cooperation based on their trust in others. We discuss how the results support an emerging consensus about trust being limited to situations of conflict and address some theoretical and societal implications for our understanding of how and why trust is so important to social interactions and relationships. © 2012 American Psychological Association.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages1090-1112
    JournalPsychological Bulletin
    Volume139
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint

    Meta-Analysis
    Conflict of Interest
    Conflict (Psychology)
    Interpersonal Relations
    Consensus

    Cite this

    Balliet, D.P. ; van Lange, P. A. M. / Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin. 2013 ; Vol. 139, No. 5. pp. 1090-1112.
    @article{11418d62497d4abfad5df5b4e0c77481,
    title = "Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis",
    abstract = "Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a conflict of interests. However, it is not clear how trust relates to behavior across situations that differ in the degree of conflicting interest: Does trust matter more when the conflict of interest is small or large According to an interdependence perspective, trust becomes an especially important determinant of behavior in situations involving larger, compared to smaller, degrees of conflicting interests. To examine this perspective, we conducted a meta-analysis involving 212 effect sizes on the relation between trust (both state and dispositional trust in others) and cooperation in social dilemmas-situations that involve varying degrees of conflict between self-interest and collective interest. Results revealed that the positive relation between trust and cooperation is stronger when there is a larger, compared to smaller, degree of conflict. We also examined several other possible moderators of the relation between trust and cooperation. The relation between trust and cooperation was stronger during individual, compared to intergroup, interactions but did not vary as a function of the situation being either a one-shot or repeated interaction. We also find differences across countries in the extent that people condition their own cooperation based on their trust in others. We discuss how the results support an emerging consensus about trust being limited to situations of conflict and address some theoretical and societal implications for our understanding of how and why trust is so important to social interactions and relationships. {\circledC} 2012 American Psychological Association.",
    author = "D.P. Balliet and {van Lange}, {P. A. M.}",
    year = "2013",
    doi = "10.1037/a0030939",
    language = "English",
    volume = "139",
    pages = "1090--1112",
    journal = "Psychological Bulletin",
    issn = "0033-2909",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association",
    number = "5",

    }

    Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis. / Balliet, D.P.; van Lange, P. A. M.

    In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 139, No. 5, 2013, p. 1090-1112.

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Trust, conflict and cooperation: A meta-analysis

    AU - Balliet, D.P.

    AU - van Lange, P. A. M.

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a conflict of interests. However, it is not clear how trust relates to behavior across situations that differ in the degree of conflicting interest: Does trust matter more when the conflict of interest is small or large According to an interdependence perspective, trust becomes an especially important determinant of behavior in situations involving larger, compared to smaller, degrees of conflicting interests. To examine this perspective, we conducted a meta-analysis involving 212 effect sizes on the relation between trust (both state and dispositional trust in others) and cooperation in social dilemmas-situations that involve varying degrees of conflict between self-interest and collective interest. Results revealed that the positive relation between trust and cooperation is stronger when there is a larger, compared to smaller, degree of conflict. We also examined several other possible moderators of the relation between trust and cooperation. The relation between trust and cooperation was stronger during individual, compared to intergroup, interactions but did not vary as a function of the situation being either a one-shot or repeated interaction. We also find differences across countries in the extent that people condition their own cooperation based on their trust in others. We discuss how the results support an emerging consensus about trust being limited to situations of conflict and address some theoretical and societal implications for our understanding of how and why trust is so important to social interactions and relationships. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

    AB - Many theories of trust emphasize that trust is most relevant to behavior in situations involving a conflict of interests. However, it is not clear how trust relates to behavior across situations that differ in the degree of conflicting interest: Does trust matter more when the conflict of interest is small or large According to an interdependence perspective, trust becomes an especially important determinant of behavior in situations involving larger, compared to smaller, degrees of conflicting interests. To examine this perspective, we conducted a meta-analysis involving 212 effect sizes on the relation between trust (both state and dispositional trust in others) and cooperation in social dilemmas-situations that involve varying degrees of conflict between self-interest and collective interest. Results revealed that the positive relation between trust and cooperation is stronger when there is a larger, compared to smaller, degree of conflict. We also examined several other possible moderators of the relation between trust and cooperation. The relation between trust and cooperation was stronger during individual, compared to intergroup, interactions but did not vary as a function of the situation being either a one-shot or repeated interaction. We also find differences across countries in the extent that people condition their own cooperation based on their trust in others. We discuss how the results support an emerging consensus about trust being limited to situations of conflict and address some theoretical and societal implications for our understanding of how and why trust is so important to social interactions and relationships. © 2012 American Psychological Association.

    U2 - 10.1037/a0030939

    DO - 10.1037/a0030939

    M3 - Article

    VL - 139

    SP - 1090

    EP - 1112

    JO - Psychological Bulletin

    T2 - Psychological Bulletin

    JF - Psychological Bulletin

    SN - 0033-2909

    IS - 5

    ER -