Abstract
This paper examines the link between truth and sight, and the implications of this link for our understandings of the concept of evidence. I propose to give an example of precisely how we might attempt to generalize about a phenomenon such as the recurrence of the association between truth and sight without ignoring important anti-universalist points. In doing this, I hope to give one example of how anthropology, in the original sense of the term, is a still possible enterprise, in spite of the criticisms such an approach has had to face in the last thirty years. © Royal Anthropological Institute 2008.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 22-32 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 1 (special issue) |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |