Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity

Jake M. Robinson*, Nicole Redvers, Araceli Camargo, Christina A. Bosch, Martin F. Breed, Lisa A. Brenner, Megan A. Carney, Ashvini Chauhan, Mauna Dasari, Leslie G. Dietz, Michael Friedman, Laura Grieneisen, Andrew J. Hoisington, Patrick F. Horve, Ally Hunter, Sierra Jech, Anna Jorgensen, Christopher A. Lowry, Ioana Man, Gwynne MhuireachEdauri Navarro-Pérez, Euan G. Ritchie, Justin D. Stewart, Harry Watkins, Philip Weinstein, Suzanne L. Ishaq

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to JournalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Social and political policy, human activities, and environmental change affect the ways in which microbial communities assemble and interact with people. These factors determine how different social groups are exposed to beneficial and/ or harmful microorganisms, meaning microbial exposure has an important socioecological justice context. Therefore, greater consideration of microbial exposure and social equity in research, planning, and policy is imperative. Here, we identify 20 research questions considered fundamentally important to promoting equitable exposure to beneficial microorganisms, along with safeguarding resilient societies and ecosystems. The 20 research questions we identified span seven broad themes, including the following: (i) sociocultural interactions; (ii) Indigenous community health and well-being; (iii) humans, urban ecosystems, and environmental processes; (iv) human psychology and mental health; (v) microbiomes and infectious diseases; (vi) human health and food security; and (vii) microbiome-related planning, policy, and outreach. Our goal was to summarize this growing field and to stimulate impactful research avenues while providing focus for funders and policymakers.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numbere01240-21
    Pages (from-to)1-26
    Number of pages26
    JournalmSystems
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    Early online date4 Jan 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

    Bibliographical note

    Funding Information:
    We are grateful to the following funding agencies who have supported the individuals in this group and their research efforts. S.L.I. is partially supported by the University of Maine: Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station (MAFES ME022102, Ishaq). J.D.S. is supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO/OCW), as part of the MiCRop Consortium program, Harnessing the second genome of plants (grant 024.004.014).

    Publisher Copyright:
    Copyright © 2022 Robinson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

    Funding

    We are grateful to the following funding agencies who have supported the individuals in this group and their research efforts. S.L.I. is partially supported by the University of Maine: Maine Agricultural and Forest Experiment Station (MAFES ME022102, Ishaq). J.D.S. is supported by the Dutch Research Council (NWO/OCW), as part of the MiCRop Consortium program, Harnessing the second genome of plants (grant 024.004.014).

    FundersFunder number
    Harnessing the second genome of plants024.004.014
    University of MaineMAFES ME022102
    University of Maine
    Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap
    Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek

      Keywords

      • Biopolitics
      • Health disparities
      • Integrated research
      • Microbiomes
      • Social determinants of health
      • Structural determinants
      • Structural determinants of health

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Twenty Important Research Questions in Microbial Exposure and Social Equity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this