Abstract
In this article, Betty de Hart examines the Court of Haarlem's decision from December 7, 2022, and considers the ramifications of the State Secretary's statement. She also analyzes differences between Danish and Swedish waiting periods for family reunification of beneficiaries of subsidiary and temporary protection and judgements from the European Court of Human Rights.
| Translated title of the contribution | Ruling explained. Rulings on family reunification of refugees: fully expected and happened |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Article number | ve23000203 |
| Journal | Asiel&Migrantenrecht |
| Volume | 2023 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 31 Jan 2023 |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ruling explained. Rulings on family reunification of refugees: fully expected and happened'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver