Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union

Tania Runge; Uwe Latacz-Lohmann; Lena Schaller; Kristina Todorova; Carsten Daugbjerg; Mette Termansen; Jaan Liira; Fanny Le Gloux; Pierre Dupraz; Jussi Leppanen; József Fogarasi; Enikő Zita Vigh; Tracy Bradfield; Thia Hennessy; Stefano Targetti; Davide Viaggi; Inga Berzina; Catharina Schulp; Edward Majewski; Laura Bouriaud; Gabriela Baciu; Mireia Pecurul; Irina Prokofieva; Francisco Jose Blanco Velazquez

doi:10.1111/1746-692X.12352

Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union

Translated title of the contribution: Implementation of Eco-schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States

Tania Runge^*, Uwe Latacz-Lohmann, Lena Schaller, Kristina Todorova, Carsten Daugbjerg, Mette Termansen, Jaan Liira, Fanny Le Gloux, Pierre Dupraz, Jussi Leppanen, József Fogarasi, Enikő Zita Vigh, Tracy Bradfield, Thia Hennessy, Stefano Targetti, Davide Viaggi, Inga Berzina, Catharina Schulp, Edward Majewski, Laura BouriaudGabriela Baciu, Mireia Pecurul, Irina Prokofieva, Francisco Jose Blanco Velazquez

^*Corresponding author for this work

Environmental Geography

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Eco-schemes are set to play an important role in the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2022 for the delivery of environmental and climate benefits and enhanced animal welfare. This article surveys current plans for the design of eco-schemes in fifteen European Union Member States. The number of eco-scheme measures to be offered per country varies between 3 and 21, and the complexity and level of ambition of the individual measures are quite heterogeneous. The majority of the proposed eco-scheme measures either build upon components from greening obligations or stem from agri-environmental and climate schemes currently offered under Pillar 2. All fifteen Member States address Green Deal targets, with particular emphasis being given to biodiversity enhancement and non-productive land. Eight of the countries surveyed are planning to provide support for organic farming through an eco-scheme. The greater creative freedom offered by the CAP’s New Delivery Model has resulted in a situation where similar measures are programmed as eco-schemes in some countries and as Pillar 2 measures in others. By adding yet another policy instrument to the CAP’s toolbox, the complexity of the CAP is vastly increased. It remains to be seen how farmers will respond.

Translated title of the contribution	Implementation of Eco-schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States
Original language	German
Pages (from-to)	19-27
Number of pages	9
Journal	EuroChoices
Volume	21
Issue number	2
Early online date	8 Jul 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12352
Publication status	Published - Aug 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Against this backdrop, this article aims to provide an overview of current planning in 15 Member States regarding the national implementation of eco‐schemes. Potential coverage with respect to environmental and climate objectives is illustrated in currently discussed eco‐schemes. The article also provides details of eco‐schemes that directly target the objectives of the Farm‐to‐Fork Strategy. A significant contribution to those objectives will be required for the approval of the National Strategic Plans by the EU Commission. While this approval is due in the course of 2022, the assessment here is based on proposals as of January/February 2022. The information was gathered by researchers of two complementary projects EFFECT and CONSOLE that received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme.

Funding Information:
This research was funded by the European Commission via the two sister projects EFFECT (Environmental public goods From Farming through Effective Contract Targeting) and CONSOLE (CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agri‐environmental‐climate public goods by EU agriculture and forestry) under grant agreement No 817903 (EFFECT) and No 817949 (CONSOLE).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. EuroChoices published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists.

Funding

Against this backdrop, this article aims to provide an overview of current planning in 15 Member States regarding the national implementation of eco‐schemes. Potential coverage with respect to environmental and climate objectives is illustrated in currently discussed eco‐schemes. The article also provides details of eco‐schemes that directly target the objectives of the Farm‐to‐Fork Strategy. A significant contribution to those objectives will be required for the approval of the National Strategic Plans by the EU Commission. While this approval is due in the course of 2022, the assessment here is based on proposals as of January/February 2022. The information was gathered by researchers of two complementary projects EFFECT and CONSOLE that received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme. This research was funded by the European Commission via the two sister projects EFFECT (Environmental public goods From Farming through Effective Contract Targeting) and CONSOLE (CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agri‐environmental‐climate public goods by EU agriculture and forestry) under grant agreement No 817903 (EFFECT) and No 817949 (CONSOLE).

Funders	Funder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme	817903, 817949
European Commission
Horizon 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1111/1746-692X.12352

Persistent URL (handle)

Copy link address

Cite this

Runge, T., Latacz-Lohmann, U., Schaller, L., Todorova, K., Daugbjerg, C., Termansen, M., Liira, J., Le Gloux, F., Dupraz, P., Leppanen, J., Fogarasi, J., Vigh, E. Z., Bradfield, T., Hennessy, T., Targetti, S., Viaggi, D., Berzina, I., Schulp, C., Majewski, E., ... Velazquez, F. J. B. (2022). Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union. EuroChoices, 21(2), 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12352

@article{88a667b8abe54f658a90e6a36b6fd9ab,

title = "Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in f{\"u}nfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europ{\"a}ischen Union",

abstract = "Eco-schemes are set to play an important role in the European Union{\textquoteright}s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2022 for the delivery of environmental and climate benefits and enhanced animal welfare. This article surveys current plans for the design of eco-schemes in fifteen European Union Member States. The number of eco-scheme measures to be offered per country varies between 3 and 21, and the complexity and level of ambition of the individual measures are quite heterogeneous. The majority of the proposed eco-scheme measures either build upon components from greening obligations or stem from agri-environmental and climate schemes currently offered under Pillar 2. All fifteen Member States address Green Deal targets, with particular emphasis being given to biodiversity enhancement and non-productive land. Eight of the countries surveyed are planning to provide support for organic farming through an eco-scheme. The greater creative freedom offered by the CAP{\textquoteright}s New Delivery Model has resulted in a situation where similar measures are programmed as eco-schemes in some countries and as Pillar 2 measures in others. By adding yet another policy instrument to the CAP{\textquoteright}s toolbox, the complexity of the CAP is vastly increased. It remains to be seen how farmers will respond.",

author = "Tania Runge and Uwe Latacz-Lohmann and Lena Schaller and Kristina Todorova and Carsten Daugbjerg and Mette Termansen and Jaan Liira and {Le Gloux}, Fanny and Pierre Dupraz and Jussi Leppanen and J{\'o}zsef Fogarasi and Vigh, {Enik{\H o} Zita} and Tracy Bradfield and Thia Hennessy and Stefano Targetti and Davide Viaggi and Inga Berzina and Catharina Schulp and Edward Majewski and Laura Bouriaud and Gabriela Baciu and Mireia Pecurul and Irina Prokofieva and Velazquez, {Francisco Jose Blanco}",

note = "Funding Information: Against this backdrop, this article aims to provide an overview of current planning in 15 Member States regarding the national implementation of eco‐schemes. Potential coverage with respect to environmental and climate objectives is illustrated in currently discussed eco‐schemes. The article also provides details of eco‐schemes that directly target the objectives of the Farm‐to‐Fork Strategy. A significant contribution to those objectives will be required for the approval of the National Strategic Plans by the EU Commission. While this approval is due in the course of 2022, the assessment here is based on proposals as of January/February 2022. The information was gathered by researchers of two complementary projects EFFECT and CONSOLE that received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme. Funding Information: This research was funded by the European Commission via the two sister projects EFFECT (Environmental public goods From Farming through Effective Contract Targeting) and CONSOLE (CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agri‐environmental‐climate public goods by EU agriculture and forestry) under grant agreement No 817903 (EFFECT) and No 817949 (CONSOLE). Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. EuroChoices published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists.",

year = "2022",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1111/1746-692X.12352",

language = "German",

volume = "21",

pages = "19--27",

journal = "EuroChoices",

issn = "1478-0917",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

Runge, T, Latacz-Lohmann, U, Schaller, L, Todorova, K, Daugbjerg, C, Termansen, M, Liira, J, Le Gloux, F, Dupraz, P, Leppanen, J, Fogarasi, J, Vigh, EZ, Bradfield, T, Hennessy, T, Targetti, S, Viaggi, D, Berzina, I, Schulp, C, Majewski, E, Bouriaud, L, Baciu, G, Pecurul, M, Prokofieva, I & Velazquez, FJB 2022, 'Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union', EuroChoices, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12352

TY - JOUR

T1 - Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union

AU - Runge, Tania

AU - Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe

AU - Schaller, Lena

AU - Todorova, Kristina

AU - Daugbjerg, Carsten

AU - Termansen, Mette

AU - Liira, Jaan

AU - Le Gloux, Fanny

AU - Dupraz, Pierre

AU - Leppanen, Jussi

AU - Fogarasi, József

AU - Vigh, Enikő Zita

AU - Bradfield, Tracy

AU - Hennessy, Thia

AU - Targetti, Stefano

AU - Viaggi, Davide

AU - Berzina, Inga

AU - Schulp, Catharina

AU - Majewski, Edward

AU - Bouriaud, Laura

AU - Baciu, Gabriela

AU - Pecurul, Mireia

AU - Prokofieva, Irina

AU - Velazquez, Francisco Jose Blanco

N1 - Funding Information: Against this backdrop, this article aims to provide an overview of current planning in 15 Member States regarding the national implementation of eco‐schemes. Potential coverage with respect to environmental and climate objectives is illustrated in currently discussed eco‐schemes. The article also provides details of eco‐schemes that directly target the objectives of the Farm‐to‐Fork Strategy. A significant contribution to those objectives will be required for the approval of the National Strategic Plans by the EU Commission. While this approval is due in the course of 2022, the assessment here is based on proposals as of January/February 2022. The information was gathered by researchers of two complementary projects EFFECT and CONSOLE that received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme. Funding Information: This research was funded by the European Commission via the two sister projects EFFECT (Environmental public goods From Farming through Effective Contract Targeting) and CONSOLE (CONtract SOLutions for Effective and lasting delivery of agri‐environmental‐climate public goods by EU agriculture and forestry) under grant agreement No 817903 (EFFECT) and No 817949 (CONSOLE). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors. EuroChoices published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists.

PY - 2022/8

Y1 - 2022/8

N2 - Eco-schemes are set to play an important role in the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2022 for the delivery of environmental and climate benefits and enhanced animal welfare. This article surveys current plans for the design of eco-schemes in fifteen European Union Member States. The number of eco-scheme measures to be offered per country varies between 3 and 21, and the complexity and level of ambition of the individual measures are quite heterogeneous. The majority of the proposed eco-scheme measures either build upon components from greening obligations or stem from agri-environmental and climate schemes currently offered under Pillar 2. All fifteen Member States address Green Deal targets, with particular emphasis being given to biodiversity enhancement and non-productive land. Eight of the countries surveyed are planning to provide support for organic farming through an eco-scheme. The greater creative freedom offered by the CAP’s New Delivery Model has resulted in a situation where similar measures are programmed as eco-schemes in some countries and as Pillar 2 measures in others. By adding yet another policy instrument to the CAP’s toolbox, the complexity of the CAP is vastly increased. It remains to be seen how farmers will respond.

AB - Eco-schemes are set to play an important role in the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) post-2022 for the delivery of environmental and climate benefits and enhanced animal welfare. This article surveys current plans for the design of eco-schemes in fifteen European Union Member States. The number of eco-scheme measures to be offered per country varies between 3 and 21, and the complexity and level of ambition of the individual measures are quite heterogeneous. The majority of the proposed eco-scheme measures either build upon components from greening obligations or stem from agri-environmental and climate schemes currently offered under Pillar 2. All fifteen Member States address Green Deal targets, with particular emphasis being given to biodiversity enhancement and non-productive land. Eight of the countries surveyed are planning to provide support for organic farming through an eco-scheme. The greater creative freedom offered by the CAP’s New Delivery Model has resulted in a situation where similar measures are programmed as eco-schemes in some countries and as Pillar 2 measures in others. By adding yet another policy instrument to the CAP’s toolbox, the complexity of the CAP is vastly increased. It remains to be seen how farmers will respond.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133632706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85133632706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1746-692X.12352

DO - 10.1111/1746-692X.12352

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85133632706

SN - 1478-0917

VL - 21

SP - 19

EP - 27

JO - EuroChoices

JF - EuroChoices

IS - 2

ER -

Umsetzung der Eco-Schemes in fünfzehn Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Funding

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this