Abstract
There has been limited adoption of Immersive Journalism (IJ) by the audience; simultaneously, the audience’s perspective is rarely considered in the production and research of IJ. At this point, however, it is crucial to incorporate an audience perspective to identify potentially unintended effects of IJ and improve on the innovation of IJ. This study investigates the audience’s experience and evaluation of IJ by qualitatively analyzing their thoughts after viewing two IJ cases. Our results indicate that the audience may pick up on intended effects, such as a sense of presence and an intense emotional experience, but some also express unease towards these effects. Furthermore, the audience struggles to comprehend this study’s two immersive journalistic cases as part of the journalistic genre. These findings provide insight into the gap between the initial hype and the current reality of IJ and provide the basis for propositions for future IJ productions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2383-2401 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Journalism |
Volume | 25 |
Issue number | 11 |
Early online date | 13 Nov 2023 |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2024 |
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by Taskforce for Applied Research SIA in the Netherlands under Raak Publiek, No. RAAK.PUB04.004; and by Osterreichische Nationalbank Jubilaumsfonds, under grant No. 18403. Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 26419.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Osterreichische Nationalbank Jubilaumsfonds | 18403 |
Taskforce for Applied Research SIA | RAAK.PUB04.004 |