Abstract
Emerging from distinct perspectives, decent work and meaningful work are fundamental aspects of contemporary work with profound implications for individuals, organizations, and society. Decent work reflects basic workplace conditions to which all employees are entitled, whereas meaningful work is aspirational, reflecting significance at work. Following a conceptual and empirical review of scholarship on decent work and meaningful work, we draw from psychology of working theory to connect the two constructs. We argue that need satisfaction serves as the primary connector, and societal context, organizational conditions, and individual practices (in order of effectiveness) promote access to each type of work. We suggest future research directions broadening the available scholarship and methods used, promoting a focus on the complex intersection of macrolevel and psychological factors as well as interdisciplinary approaches in determining the quality of work, and engaging in intervention research to improve the way in which people live and work together.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 289-314 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior |
| Volume | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Annual Reviews Inc.. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- decent work
- job design
- meaningful work
- meaningfulness
- psychology of working
- work conditions