Understanding mixed forms of refuse collection, privatisation and its reverse in the Netherlands

R.H.J.M. Gradus, E. Dijkgraaf, M.C. Wassenaar

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Based on panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities, we analyze changes in the mode of service production for refuse collection between 1998 and 2010. We distinguish execution by private enterprises, municipal enterprises, municipal cooperation, outsourcing to neighboring municipalities, and in-house collection. The number of municipalities using mixed forms, such as municipal enterprise, rose as the use of other forms declined, although municipal cooperation only decreased slightly. In approximately half of Dutch municipalities, the mode of production was stable between 1998 and 2010. In the other municipalities, shifts took place, with two-thirds being towards outside production and one-third towards inside production. Based on a logit model, we find some evidence of an ideological motivation for changing the mode of production. For income, we show that richer municipalities are less likely to change. We also illustrate the robustness of this result to various assumptions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages328-343
JournalInternational public management journal
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

privatization
municipality
Netherlands
mode of production
private enterprise
outsourcing
The Netherlands
Privatization
Municipalities
income
evidence

Cite this

@article{dc5e807ed1fc4ad29829cb5d60fd1ed6,
title = "Understanding mixed forms of refuse collection, privatisation and its reverse in the Netherlands",
abstract = "Based on panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities, we analyze changes in the mode of service production for refuse collection between 1998 and 2010. We distinguish execution by private enterprises, municipal enterprises, municipal cooperation, outsourcing to neighboring municipalities, and in-house collection. The number of municipalities using mixed forms, such as municipal enterprise, rose as the use of other forms declined, although municipal cooperation only decreased slightly. In approximately half of Dutch municipalities, the mode of production was stable between 1998 and 2010. In the other municipalities, shifts took place, with two-thirds being towards outside production and one-third towards inside production. Based on a logit model, we find some evidence of an ideological motivation for changing the mode of production. For income, we show that richer municipalities are less likely to change. We also illustrate the robustness of this result to various assumptions.",
author = "R.H.J.M. Gradus and E. Dijkgraaf and M.C. Wassenaar",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/10967494.2014.935237",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "328--343",
journal = "International public management journal",
issn = "1096-7494",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Understanding mixed forms of refuse collection, privatisation and its reverse in the Netherlands. / Gradus, R.H.J.M.; Dijkgraaf, E.; Wassenaar, M.C.

In: International public management journal, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2014, p. 328-343.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding mixed forms of refuse collection, privatisation and its reverse in the Netherlands

AU - Gradus, R.H.J.M.

AU - Dijkgraaf, E.

AU - Wassenaar, M.C.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Based on panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities, we analyze changes in the mode of service production for refuse collection between 1998 and 2010. We distinguish execution by private enterprises, municipal enterprises, municipal cooperation, outsourcing to neighboring municipalities, and in-house collection. The number of municipalities using mixed forms, such as municipal enterprise, rose as the use of other forms declined, although municipal cooperation only decreased slightly. In approximately half of Dutch municipalities, the mode of production was stable between 1998 and 2010. In the other municipalities, shifts took place, with two-thirds being towards outside production and one-third towards inside production. Based on a logit model, we find some evidence of an ideological motivation for changing the mode of production. For income, we show that richer municipalities are less likely to change. We also illustrate the robustness of this result to various assumptions.

AB - Based on panel data for almost all Dutch municipalities, we analyze changes in the mode of service production for refuse collection between 1998 and 2010. We distinguish execution by private enterprises, municipal enterprises, municipal cooperation, outsourcing to neighboring municipalities, and in-house collection. The number of municipalities using mixed forms, such as municipal enterprise, rose as the use of other forms declined, although municipal cooperation only decreased slightly. In approximately half of Dutch municipalities, the mode of production was stable between 1998 and 2010. In the other municipalities, shifts took place, with two-thirds being towards outside production and one-third towards inside production. Based on a logit model, we find some evidence of an ideological motivation for changing the mode of production. For income, we show that richer municipalities are less likely to change. We also illustrate the robustness of this result to various assumptions.

U2 - 10.1080/10967494.2014.935237

DO - 10.1080/10967494.2014.935237

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 328

EP - 343

JO - International public management journal

T2 - International public management journal

JF - International public management journal

SN - 1096-7494

IS - 3

ER -