Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict: Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital

Peter W. Lange, Marissa Lamanna, Rosie Watson, Andrea B. Maier

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed delirium in a tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common inpatient condition. It is frequently undiagnosed in a variety of settings, but determinants of undiagnosed delirium are largely unknown, and the frequency of undiagnosed delirium across all inpatient units is uncertain. The utility of hospital-wide screening then is also uncertain.

METHODS: Hospital-wide prevalence study conducted over 4 months, using a chart-based method. Gender, age, admitting unit, history of dementia and comorbidity were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to search for differences in patients with no delirium, with undiagnosed delirium and with diagnosed delirium. Sensitivity, specificity and number needed to screen were calculated from proportions in each group. Study was conducted in concordance with STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS: Delirium was prevalent in 12.5% of all patients and undiagnosed in 24.1% of patients. Only age ≥65 years and a history of dementia predicted delirium, and undiagnosed delirium in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age ≥65 years accounts for 92.3% sensitivity and 50.8% specificity for undiagnosed delirium in this group. History of dementia had a 23.0% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Twenty-eight patients would need to be screened to detect a case of undiagnosed delirium.

DISCUSSION: There was a high rate of delirium and undiagnosed delirium in this cohort. Known risk factors for delirium also independently predict undiagnosed delirium; other factors were not found.

CONCLUSION: Undiagnosed delirium is common and difficult to predict from patient baseline characteristics other than age.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessment of all inpatients for delirium is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2537-2542
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume28
Issue number13-14
Early online date20 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Delirium
Tertiary Care Centers
Dementia
Surveys and Questionnaires
Inpatients
Sensitivity and Specificity
Multivariate Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies

Bibliographical note

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Comorbidity
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Delirium/diagnosis
  • Dementia/epidemiology
  • Female
  • Geriatric Assessment/methods
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prevalence
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data

Cite this

@article{b030cdef281a473eb566685be338cb02,
title = "Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict: Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital",
abstract = "AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed delirium in a tertiary hospital.BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common inpatient condition. It is frequently undiagnosed in a variety of settings, but determinants of undiagnosed delirium are largely unknown, and the frequency of undiagnosed delirium across all inpatient units is uncertain. The utility of hospital-wide screening then is also uncertain.METHODS: Hospital-wide prevalence study conducted over 4 months, using a chart-based method. Gender, age, admitting unit, history of dementia and comorbidity were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to search for differences in patients with no delirium, with undiagnosed delirium and with diagnosed delirium. Sensitivity, specificity and number needed to screen were calculated from proportions in each group. Study was conducted in concordance with STROBE guidelines.RESULTS: Delirium was prevalent in 12.5{\%} of all patients and undiagnosed in 24.1{\%} of patients. Only age ≥65 years and a history of dementia predicted delirium, and undiagnosed delirium in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age ≥65 years accounts for 92.3{\%} sensitivity and 50.8{\%} specificity for undiagnosed delirium in this group. History of dementia had a 23.0{\%} sensitivity and 97.0{\%} specificity. Twenty-eight patients would need to be screened to detect a case of undiagnosed delirium.DISCUSSION: There was a high rate of delirium and undiagnosed delirium in this cohort. Known risk factors for delirium also independently predict undiagnosed delirium; other factors were not found.CONCLUSION: Undiagnosed delirium is common and difficult to predict from patient baseline characteristics other than age.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessment of all inpatients for delirium is recommended.",
keywords = "Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Comorbidity, Cross-Sectional Studies, Delirium/diagnosis, Dementia/epidemiology, Female, Geriatric Assessment/methods, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data",
author = "Lange, {Peter W.} and Marissa Lamanna and Rosie Watson and Maier, {Andrea B.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.14833",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "2537--2542",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "13-14",

}

Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict : Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital. / Lange, Peter W.; Lamanna, Marissa; Watson, Rosie; Maier, Andrea B.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 28, No. 13-14, 07.2019, p. 2537-2542.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict

T2 - Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital

AU - Lange, Peter W.

AU - Lamanna, Marissa

AU - Watson, Rosie

AU - Maier, Andrea B.

N1 - © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed delirium in a tertiary hospital.BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common inpatient condition. It is frequently undiagnosed in a variety of settings, but determinants of undiagnosed delirium are largely unknown, and the frequency of undiagnosed delirium across all inpatient units is uncertain. The utility of hospital-wide screening then is also uncertain.METHODS: Hospital-wide prevalence study conducted over 4 months, using a chart-based method. Gender, age, admitting unit, history of dementia and comorbidity were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to search for differences in patients with no delirium, with undiagnosed delirium and with diagnosed delirium. Sensitivity, specificity and number needed to screen were calculated from proportions in each group. Study was conducted in concordance with STROBE guidelines.RESULTS: Delirium was prevalent in 12.5% of all patients and undiagnosed in 24.1% of patients. Only age ≥65 years and a history of dementia predicted delirium, and undiagnosed delirium in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age ≥65 years accounts for 92.3% sensitivity and 50.8% specificity for undiagnosed delirium in this group. History of dementia had a 23.0% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Twenty-eight patients would need to be screened to detect a case of undiagnosed delirium.DISCUSSION: There was a high rate of delirium and undiagnosed delirium in this cohort. Known risk factors for delirium also independently predict undiagnosed delirium; other factors were not found.CONCLUSION: Undiagnosed delirium is common and difficult to predict from patient baseline characteristics other than age.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessment of all inpatients for delirium is recommended.

AB - AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed delirium in a tertiary hospital.BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common inpatient condition. It is frequently undiagnosed in a variety of settings, but determinants of undiagnosed delirium are largely unknown, and the frequency of undiagnosed delirium across all inpatient units is uncertain. The utility of hospital-wide screening then is also uncertain.METHODS: Hospital-wide prevalence study conducted over 4 months, using a chart-based method. Gender, age, admitting unit, history of dementia and comorbidity were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to search for differences in patients with no delirium, with undiagnosed delirium and with diagnosed delirium. Sensitivity, specificity and number needed to screen were calculated from proportions in each group. Study was conducted in concordance with STROBE guidelines.RESULTS: Delirium was prevalent in 12.5% of all patients and undiagnosed in 24.1% of patients. Only age ≥65 years and a history of dementia predicted delirium, and undiagnosed delirium in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age ≥65 years accounts for 92.3% sensitivity and 50.8% specificity for undiagnosed delirium in this group. History of dementia had a 23.0% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Twenty-eight patients would need to be screened to detect a case of undiagnosed delirium.DISCUSSION: There was a high rate of delirium and undiagnosed delirium in this cohort. Known risk factors for delirium also independently predict undiagnosed delirium; other factors were not found.CONCLUSION: Undiagnosed delirium is common and difficult to predict from patient baseline characteristics other than age.RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessment of all inpatients for delirium is recommended.

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Comorbidity

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Delirium/diagnosis

KW - Dementia/epidemiology

KW - Female

KW - Geriatric Assessment/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Prevalence

KW - Risk Factors

KW - Sensitivity and Specificity

KW - Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067312816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067312816&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.14833

DO - 10.1111/jocn.14833

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 2537

EP - 2542

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 13-14

ER -