Unverdiente Privilegien? Zur Kritik atheistischer Überlegenheitsansprüche und deren Legitimierung durch den Evidentialismus

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In the first part of this article, some strategies are analyzed with the help of which atheists attempt to claim unearned cognitive privileges for their position. In particular, the connection between evidentialism and the 'presumption of atheism' (Anthony Flew) is scrutinized. In addition, Paul Cliteur's strategy to discredit agnosticism as a viable third option between theism and atheism in order to privilege atheism is investigated. In the second part of this article, evidentialism is reconstructed as being a context-dependent doctrine and the issue of (a) theism is treated under action-theoretical rather than epistemological parameters. As a result, the suggestion that the theist alone has the duty to legitimate her position while the atheist does not have any comparable duty is rejected and the issue of (a)theism is reconstructed without unearned cognitive privileges.

Original languageGerman
Pages (from-to)119-148
Number of pages30
JournalNeue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Atheism
  • Cliteur
  • Dawkins
  • Evidence
  • Flew

Cite this

@article{55efe65cf93e40ab88029dff8b8f8335,
title = "Unverdiente Privilegien? Zur Kritik atheistischer {\"U}berlegenheitsanspr{\"u}che und deren Legitimierung durch den Evidentialismus",
abstract = "In the first part of this article, some strategies are analyzed with the help of which atheists attempt to claim unearned cognitive privileges for their position. In particular, the connection between evidentialism and the 'presumption of atheism' (Anthony Flew) is scrutinized. In addition, Paul Cliteur's strategy to discredit agnosticism as a viable third option between theism and atheism in order to privilege atheism is investigated. In the second part of this article, evidentialism is reconstructed as being a context-dependent doctrine and the issue of (a) theism is treated under action-theoretical rather than epistemological parameters. As a result, the suggestion that the theist alone has the duty to legitimate her position while the atheist does not have any comparable duty is rejected and the issue of (a)theism is reconstructed without unearned cognitive privileges.",
keywords = "Atheism, Cliteur, Dawkins, Evidence, Flew",
author = "Grube, {Dirk Martin}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1515/nzsth-2019-0007",
language = "German",
volume = "61",
pages = "119--148",
journal = "Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie",
issn = "0028-3517",
publisher = "Walter de Gruyter GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Unverdiente Privilegien? Zur Kritik atheistischer Überlegenheitsansprüche und deren Legitimierung durch den Evidentialismus

AU - Grube, Dirk Martin

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - In the first part of this article, some strategies are analyzed with the help of which atheists attempt to claim unearned cognitive privileges for their position. In particular, the connection between evidentialism and the 'presumption of atheism' (Anthony Flew) is scrutinized. In addition, Paul Cliteur's strategy to discredit agnosticism as a viable third option between theism and atheism in order to privilege atheism is investigated. In the second part of this article, evidentialism is reconstructed as being a context-dependent doctrine and the issue of (a) theism is treated under action-theoretical rather than epistemological parameters. As a result, the suggestion that the theist alone has the duty to legitimate her position while the atheist does not have any comparable duty is rejected and the issue of (a)theism is reconstructed without unearned cognitive privileges.

AB - In the first part of this article, some strategies are analyzed with the help of which atheists attempt to claim unearned cognitive privileges for their position. In particular, the connection between evidentialism and the 'presumption of atheism' (Anthony Flew) is scrutinized. In addition, Paul Cliteur's strategy to discredit agnosticism as a viable third option between theism and atheism in order to privilege atheism is investigated. In the second part of this article, evidentialism is reconstructed as being a context-dependent doctrine and the issue of (a) theism is treated under action-theoretical rather than epistemological parameters. As a result, the suggestion that the theist alone has the duty to legitimate her position while the atheist does not have any comparable duty is rejected and the issue of (a)theism is reconstructed without unearned cognitive privileges.

KW - Atheism

KW - Cliteur

KW - Dawkins

KW - Evidence

KW - Flew

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067258543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067258543&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/nzsth-2019-0007

DO - 10.1515/nzsth-2019-0007

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 119

EP - 148

JO - Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie

JF - Neue Zeitschrift fur Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie

SN - 0028-3517

IS - 2

ER -