Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial

Maarten Cuypers; Romy E.D. Lamers; Paul J.M. Kil; Julia J. van Tol-Geerdink; Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan; Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse; Marieke de Vries

doi:10.1177/1460458218779110

Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial

Maarten Cuypers^*, Romy E.D. Lamers, Paul J.M. Kil, Julia J. van Tol-Geerdink, Cornelia F. van Uden-Kraan, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse, Marieke de Vries

^*Corresponding author for this work

Clinical Psychology

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Implementation of patient’s decision aids in routine clinical care is generally low. This study evaluated uptake and usage of a novel Dutch web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid within the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. From an estimated total patient sample of 1006 patients, 351 received a decision aid (35% implementation rate; hospital ranges 16%–84%). After receipt of the decision aid, most patients accessed the decision aid, utilized most functions, although not completely, and discussed the decision aid summary in a subsequent consultation with their care provider. Including nurses for dissemination of decision aids seemed to positively affect decision aid uptake. Once received, patients seemed able to use the decision aid and engage in shared decision-making as intended; however, decision aid uptake and complete usage of all decision aid components should be further improved. Prior to the diagnosis consultation, handing out of the decision aid should be prepared.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1498-1510
Number of pages	13
Journal	Health Informatics Journal
Volume	25
Issue number	4
Early online date	1 Jun 2018
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218779110
Publication status	Published - 1 Dec 2019

Funding

The authors thank all patients participating in this study and all hospitals and involved staff from Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg and Waalwijk; Catharina hospital, Eindhoven; Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven; St. Antonius hospital, Nieuwegein; Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen and Sittard; Haga Medical Center, The Hague and Jeroen Bosch hospital, ‘s-Hertogenbosch; all in the Netherlands. The authors would also like to thank Zorgkeuzelab for the technical development of the DA and providing the DA log data needed for this study. Finally, the authors thank Dr Linda van Mierlo of CZ for her role in facilitating this study. Trial registration: Dutch Trial Register, NTR-4554. The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Financial support for this study was provided by a grant from CZ Fund (Grant 2013-00070). The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data and writing and publishing the report. The DA development was funded by Delectus Foundation.

Funders	Funder number
Delectus Foundation
Dutch Trial Register	2013-00070, NTR-4554
Haga Medical Center
Hague and Jeroen Bosch hospital

Keywords

decision aids
implementation
oncology
prostate cancer
shared decision-making

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/1460458218779110

Persistent URL (handle)

Persistent link

Cite this

Cuypers, M., Lamers, R. E. D., Kil, P. J. M., van Tol-Geerdink, J. J., van Uden-Kraan, C. F., van de Poll-Franse, L. V., & de Vries, M. (2019). Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. Health Informatics Journal, 25(4), 1498-1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218779110

@article{2c7078fd439b4c38bd68ed1939563214,

title = "Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial",

abstract = "Implementation of patient{\textquoteright}s decision aids in routine clinical care is generally low. This study evaluated uptake and usage of a novel Dutch web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid within the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. From an estimated total patient sample of 1006 patients, 351 received a decision aid (35% implementation rate; hospital ranges 16%–84%). After receipt of the decision aid, most patients accessed the decision aid, utilized most functions, although not completely, and discussed the decision aid summary in a subsequent consultation with their care provider. Including nurses for dissemination of decision aids seemed to positively affect decision aid uptake. Once received, patients seemed able to use the decision aid and engage in shared decision-making as intended; however, decision aid uptake and complete usage of all decision aid components should be further improved. Prior to the diagnosis consultation, handing out of the decision aid should be prepared.",

keywords = "decision aids, implementation, oncology, prostate cancer, shared decision-making",

author = "Maarten Cuypers and Lamers, {Romy E.D.} and Kil, {Paul J.M.} and {van Tol-Geerdink}, {Julia J.} and {van Uden-Kraan}, {Cornelia F.} and {van de Poll-Franse}, {Lonneke V.} and {de Vries}, Marieke",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1460458218779110",

language = "English",

volume = "25",

pages = "1498--1510",

journal = "Health Informatics Journal",

issn = "1460-4582",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

number = "4",

}

Cuypers, M, Lamers, RED, Kil, PJM, van Tol-Geerdink, JJ, van Uden-Kraan, CF, van de Poll-Franse, LV & de Vries, M 2019, 'Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial', Health Informatics Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1498-1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458218779110

Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. / Cuypers, Maarten; Lamers, Romy E.D.; Kil, Paul J.M. et al.
In: Health Informatics Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, 01.12.2019, p. 1498-1510.

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice

T2 - A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial

AU - Cuypers, Maarten

AU - Lamers, Romy E.D.

AU - Kil, Paul J.M.

AU - van Tol-Geerdink, Julia J.

AU - van Uden-Kraan, Cornelia F.

AU - van de Poll-Franse, Lonneke V.

AU - de Vries, Marieke

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Implementation of patient’s decision aids in routine clinical care is generally low. This study evaluated uptake and usage of a novel Dutch web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid within the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. From an estimated total patient sample of 1006 patients, 351 received a decision aid (35% implementation rate; hospital ranges 16%–84%). After receipt of the decision aid, most patients accessed the decision aid, utilized most functions, although not completely, and discussed the decision aid summary in a subsequent consultation with their care provider. Including nurses for dissemination of decision aids seemed to positively affect decision aid uptake. Once received, patients seemed able to use the decision aid and engage in shared decision-making as intended; however, decision aid uptake and complete usage of all decision aid components should be further improved. Prior to the diagnosis consultation, handing out of the decision aid should be prepared.

AB - Implementation of patient’s decision aids in routine clinical care is generally low. This study evaluated uptake and usage of a novel Dutch web-based prostate cancer treatment decision aid within the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. From an estimated total patient sample of 1006 patients, 351 received a decision aid (35% implementation rate; hospital ranges 16%–84%). After receipt of the decision aid, most patients accessed the decision aid, utilized most functions, although not completely, and discussed the decision aid summary in a subsequent consultation with their care provider. Including nurses for dissemination of decision aids seemed to positively affect decision aid uptake. Once received, patients seemed able to use the decision aid and engage in shared decision-making as intended; however, decision aid uptake and complete usage of all decision aid components should be further improved. Prior to the diagnosis consultation, handing out of the decision aid should be prepared.

KW - decision aids

KW - implementation

KW - oncology

KW - prostate cancer

KW - shared decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047916965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047916965&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1460458218779110

DO - 10.1177/1460458218779110

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85047916965

SN - 1460-4582

VL - 25

SP - 1498

EP - 1510

JO - Health Informatics Journal

JF - Health Informatics Journal

IS - 4

ER -

Cuypers M, Lamers RED, Kil PJM, van Tol-Geerdink JJ, van Uden-Kraan CF, van de Poll-Franse LV et al. Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial. Health Informatics Journal. 2019 Dec 1;25(4):1498-1510. Epub 2018 Jun 1. doi: 10.1177/1460458218779110

Uptake and usage of an online prostate cancer treatment decision aid in Dutch clinical practice: A quantitative analysis from the Prostate Cancer Patient Centered Care trial

Abstract

Funding

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Persistent URL (handle)

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this