TY - JOUR
T1 - Using cognitive pretesting to explore causes for ethnic differences on role-plays
AU - Oostrom, J.K.
AU - Born, M.P.
N1 - PT: J; NR: 51; TC: 0; J9: INT J INTERCULT REL; PG: 12; GA: AN6GH; UT: WOS:000340692500012
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - This study used cognitive pretesting to assess what factors could be causing score differences between ethnic majority and ethnic minority applicants on role-plays. In a laboratory room, equipped with a video camera, cognitive interviews were conducted among 12 ethnic majority and 12 ethnic minority students to examine ethnic differences in the interpretation of the instructional texts of two role-plays. Four trained assessors independently rated the participants' videotaped responses. The assessors were asked to indicate whether the participants had understood the instructional text in general, the intended meaning of specific words or phrases, the problem, the job role, and the context of the situation. Ethnic differences were found for almost all of these aspects of the instructional texts (d-values varied between -0.02 and 0.89), indicating that the texts often did not activate the same concepts in the ethnic minority group as in the ethnic majority group. Ethnic differences in verbal ability explained only part of the ethnic differences in the interpretation of the instruction of the role-plays. Cognitive pretesting seems to be a valuable method to assess differences between ethnic majority and ethnic minority applicants in how they interpret test items and instructional texts. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
AB - This study used cognitive pretesting to assess what factors could be causing score differences between ethnic majority and ethnic minority applicants on role-plays. In a laboratory room, equipped with a video camera, cognitive interviews were conducted among 12 ethnic majority and 12 ethnic minority students to examine ethnic differences in the interpretation of the instructional texts of two role-plays. Four trained assessors independently rated the participants' videotaped responses. The assessors were asked to indicate whether the participants had understood the instructional text in general, the intended meaning of specific words or phrases, the problem, the job role, and the context of the situation. Ethnic differences were found for almost all of these aspects of the instructional texts (d-values varied between -0.02 and 0.89), indicating that the texts often did not activate the same concepts in the ethnic minority group as in the ethnic majority group. Ethnic differences in verbal ability explained only part of the ethnic differences in the interpretation of the instruction of the role-plays. Cognitive pretesting seems to be a valuable method to assess differences between ethnic majority and ethnic minority applicants in how they interpret test items and instructional texts. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.12.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.12.008
M3 - Article
SN - 0147-1767
VL - 41
SP - 138
EP - 149
JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations
JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations
ER -