Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations: Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning

Henk Stulp, Jurrijn Koelen, A. Schep-Akkerman, Gerrit Glas, L. Eurelings-Bontekoe

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Results about associations between God representations and well-being/mental health can be questioned because they are predominantly based on studies with self-report instruments. There are no well-validated implicit measures of God representations. Therefore we developed the Apperception Test for God Representations (ATGR). In a clinical (n = 75) and a nonclinical (n = 71) sample, we found patterns of associations of scales of the ATGR and of an explicit God representation measure with implicit and explicit measures of object-relational functioning that undergirded the validity of most ATGR scales. Differences in patterns of associations between patients and nonpatients could theoretically be explained by the concept mentalization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-283
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Spirituality in Mental Health
Volume22
Issue number3
Early online date4 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Jul 2020

Keywords

  • God representations
  • implicit measure
  • mentalization
  • object relations
  • personality pathology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validation of an implicit instrument to assess God representations: Part 2: Associations between implicit and explicit measures of God representations and object-relational functioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this