Validation of the stabilometer balance test: Bridging the gap between clinical and research based balance control assessments for stroke patients

Rafaël Brouwer, Elmar Kal, John van der Kamp, Han Houdijk

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: A pronounced discrepancy exists between balance assessments for stroke survivors that are used for clinical purposes and those used for research. Clinical assessments like the Berg Balance Scale generally have stronger ecological validity, whereas research-based assessments like posturography are generally more reliable and precise. We developed a stabilometer balance test (SBT) that aims to couple measurement reliability and precision to clinical meaningfulness by means of a personalized and adaptive test procedure. Research question: To examine the validity, reliability, and measurement error of the stabilometer balance test in inpatient stroke patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, inpatient stroke patients (FAC > 2) were tested on a stabilometer with adjustable resistance to mediolateral movement. A modified staircase procedure was used to adapt task difficulty (i.e., rotational stiffness) on a trial-by-trial basis. The main outcome was the threshold stiffness at which a patient could just stay balanced. Threshold stiffness was correlated with the Berg Balance Scale and posturography measurements to determine concurrent validity (N = 86). Test-retest reliability (N = 23) was analyzed with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. The minimal detectable change was determined at individual and group level. Results: Threshold rotational stiffness moderately correlated with the Berg Balance Scale (r=−0.559, p < 0.001), and the absolute path length of the center of pressure during posturography (r=0.348, p = 0.006). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC=0.869; 95%CI=0.696–0.944). There were no floor or ceiling effects. The minimal detectable change was sufficiently small to detect relevant changes in balance control both on individual and group level. Relevance: The SBT is both a valid and reliable balance assessment in stroke patients. It is at least as precise as current clinically preferred measures and does not suffer from ceiling effects. Therefore, it is suitable for use in clinical practice as well as research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)77-84
Number of pages8
JournalGait and Posture
Volume67
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Stroke
Reproducibility of Results
Research
Inpatients
Survivors
Cross-Sectional Studies
Pressure

Keywords

  • Balance assessment
  • Reliability
  • Stabilometer
  • Stroke
  • Validity

Cite this

@article{dfe9f38e04b04fecbf15c0af16277fd3,
title = "Validation of the stabilometer balance test: Bridging the gap between clinical and research based balance control assessments for stroke patients",
abstract = "Background: A pronounced discrepancy exists between balance assessments for stroke survivors that are used for clinical purposes and those used for research. Clinical assessments like the Berg Balance Scale generally have stronger ecological validity, whereas research-based assessments like posturography are generally more reliable and precise. We developed a stabilometer balance test (SBT) that aims to couple measurement reliability and precision to clinical meaningfulness by means of a personalized and adaptive test procedure. Research question: To examine the validity, reliability, and measurement error of the stabilometer balance test in inpatient stroke patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, inpatient stroke patients (FAC > 2) were tested on a stabilometer with adjustable resistance to mediolateral movement. A modified staircase procedure was used to adapt task difficulty (i.e., rotational stiffness) on a trial-by-trial basis. The main outcome was the threshold stiffness at which a patient could just stay balanced. Threshold stiffness was correlated with the Berg Balance Scale and posturography measurements to determine concurrent validity (N = 86). Test-retest reliability (N = 23) was analyzed with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. The minimal detectable change was determined at individual and group level. Results: Threshold rotational stiffness moderately correlated with the Berg Balance Scale (r=−0.559, p < 0.001), and the absolute path length of the center of pressure during posturography (r=0.348, p = 0.006). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC=0.869; 95{\%}CI=0.696–0.944). There were no floor or ceiling effects. The minimal detectable change was sufficiently small to detect relevant changes in balance control both on individual and group level. Relevance: The SBT is both a valid and reliable balance assessment in stroke patients. It is at least as precise as current clinically preferred measures and does not suffer from ceiling effects. Therefore, it is suitable for use in clinical practice as well as research.",
keywords = "Balance assessment, Reliability, Stabilometer, Stroke, Validity",
author = "Rafa{\"e}l Brouwer and Elmar Kal and {van der Kamp}, John and Han Houdijk",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.025",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "77--84",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Validation of the stabilometer balance test : Bridging the gap between clinical and research based balance control assessments for stroke patients. / Brouwer, Rafaël; Kal, Elmar; van der Kamp, John; Houdijk, Han.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 67, 01.01.2019, p. 77-84.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the stabilometer balance test

T2 - Bridging the gap between clinical and research based balance control assessments for stroke patients

AU - Brouwer, Rafaël

AU - Kal, Elmar

AU - van der Kamp, John

AU - Houdijk, Han

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: A pronounced discrepancy exists between balance assessments for stroke survivors that are used for clinical purposes and those used for research. Clinical assessments like the Berg Balance Scale generally have stronger ecological validity, whereas research-based assessments like posturography are generally more reliable and precise. We developed a stabilometer balance test (SBT) that aims to couple measurement reliability and precision to clinical meaningfulness by means of a personalized and adaptive test procedure. Research question: To examine the validity, reliability, and measurement error of the stabilometer balance test in inpatient stroke patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, inpatient stroke patients (FAC > 2) were tested on a stabilometer with adjustable resistance to mediolateral movement. A modified staircase procedure was used to adapt task difficulty (i.e., rotational stiffness) on a trial-by-trial basis. The main outcome was the threshold stiffness at which a patient could just stay balanced. Threshold stiffness was correlated with the Berg Balance Scale and posturography measurements to determine concurrent validity (N = 86). Test-retest reliability (N = 23) was analyzed with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. The minimal detectable change was determined at individual and group level. Results: Threshold rotational stiffness moderately correlated with the Berg Balance Scale (r=−0.559, p < 0.001), and the absolute path length of the center of pressure during posturography (r=0.348, p = 0.006). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC=0.869; 95%CI=0.696–0.944). There were no floor or ceiling effects. The minimal detectable change was sufficiently small to detect relevant changes in balance control both on individual and group level. Relevance: The SBT is both a valid and reliable balance assessment in stroke patients. It is at least as precise as current clinically preferred measures and does not suffer from ceiling effects. Therefore, it is suitable for use in clinical practice as well as research.

AB - Background: A pronounced discrepancy exists between balance assessments for stroke survivors that are used for clinical purposes and those used for research. Clinical assessments like the Berg Balance Scale generally have stronger ecological validity, whereas research-based assessments like posturography are generally more reliable and precise. We developed a stabilometer balance test (SBT) that aims to couple measurement reliability and precision to clinical meaningfulness by means of a personalized and adaptive test procedure. Research question: To examine the validity, reliability, and measurement error of the stabilometer balance test in inpatient stroke patients. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, inpatient stroke patients (FAC > 2) were tested on a stabilometer with adjustable resistance to mediolateral movement. A modified staircase procedure was used to adapt task difficulty (i.e., rotational stiffness) on a trial-by-trial basis. The main outcome was the threshold stiffness at which a patient could just stay balanced. Threshold stiffness was correlated with the Berg Balance Scale and posturography measurements to determine concurrent validity (N = 86). Test-retest reliability (N = 23) was analyzed with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. The minimal detectable change was determined at individual and group level. Results: Threshold rotational stiffness moderately correlated with the Berg Balance Scale (r=−0.559, p < 0.001), and the absolute path length of the center of pressure during posturography (r=0.348, p = 0.006). Test-retest reliability was good to excellent (ICC=0.869; 95%CI=0.696–0.944). There were no floor or ceiling effects. The minimal detectable change was sufficiently small to detect relevant changes in balance control both on individual and group level. Relevance: The SBT is both a valid and reliable balance assessment in stroke patients. It is at least as precise as current clinically preferred measures and does not suffer from ceiling effects. Therefore, it is suitable for use in clinical practice as well as research.

KW - Balance assessment

KW - Reliability

KW - Stabilometer

KW - Stroke

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054166380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054166380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.025

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.09.025

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 77

EP - 84

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -