Viewing Spearman's Hypothesis from the perspective of multi-group PCA: A comment on Schonemann's criticism

C.V. Dolan, G.H. Lubke

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Jensen’s test of Spearman’s hypothesis is meant to demonstrate the importance of general intelligence in Black-White (B-W) differences in psychometric intelligence test scores. Schönemann purports to demonstrate, through an analysis of real and simulated data, and the presentation of a theorem, that Spearman correlations are artifacts. We discuss the theorem and conclude that the theorem cannot be advanced in support of the contention that Spearman correlations are positive and substantial by mathematical necessity. The theorem encompasses a multigroup principal component analysis (PCA), which is a viable model to investigate Jensen’s proposition that Blacks and Whites differ mainly with respect to g. We view Schönemann’s simulation study in the light of the multigroup PCA model, and interpret it as a study of the specificity of Spearman correlations, given model violations. As such, we find it to be open to several criticisms. Schönemann does raise an important issue, namely whether Spearman correlation can be trusted to prove the importance of g in B-W differences in psychometric IQ scores. Based on recent studies, we consider the Spearman correlation to be a suboptimal test of Spearman’s hypothesis, and contend that an explicit model-based approach should be used. © 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)231-245
Number of pages15
JournalIntelligence
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Viewing Spearman's Hypothesis from the perspective of multi-group PCA: A comment on Schonemann's criticism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this