Violence in psychosis: Conceptualizing its causal relationship with risk factors

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: While statistically robust, the association between psychosis and violence remains causally
unexplained.
Objective: To provide an overview of possible causal pathways between risk factors and violence in psychosis.
Methods: A structured narrative review of relevant studies published between 1990 and 2013, found via online
databases and bibliographies. Both reviews and empirical studies were included. No restrictions were applied
to language, study design, sample characteristics and measurement of psychosis and violence. Case reports and
studies about self-harm were excluded. A final sample of 69 studies was used.
Findings: The lack of knowledge regarding the causal relationship between psychosis and violence is partially due
to methodological aspects of research. These aspects include study design, sampling, operationalization and confounding variables. Moreover, violence is the potential outcome of several interrelated risk factors: demographics, social factors, persecutory delusions, command hallucinations, comorbid antisocial personality
pathology, substance use, inadequate insight, treatment non-adherence and physiological factors. Forty-one possible causal pathways between these risk factors and violence are presented.
Conclusions: This study stimulates research by providing a theoretical framework, avenues for future investigation and methodological recommendations. Understanding violence in psychosis enhances its prevention and
treatment, decreases stigma associated with psychosis and improves the patient's legal position.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
JournalAggression and Violent Behavior
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2015

Keywords

  • Psychosis
  • Psychotic disorder
  • Violence
  • Risk factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Violence in psychosis: Conceptualizing its causal relationship with risk factors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this