Virtual obstacle crossing: Reliability and differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls

Michiel Punt, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, Harriet Wittink, Ingrid G. van de Port, Gijs Wubbels, Jaap H. van Dieën

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction Stroke survivors often fall during walking. To reduce fall risk, gait testing and training with avoidance of virtual obstacles is gaining popularity. However, it is unknown whether and how virtual obstacle crossing is associated with fall risk. Aim The present study assessed whether obstacle crossing characteristics are reliable and assessed differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. Method We recruited twenty-nine community dwelling chronic stroke survivors. Participants crossed five virtual obstacles with increasing lengths. After a break, the test was repeated to assess test-retest reliability. For each obstacle length and trial, we determined; success rate, leading limb preference, pre and post obstacle distance, margins of stability, toe clearance, and crossing step length and speed. Subsequently, fall incidence was monitored using a fall calendar and monthly phone calls over a six-month period. Results Test-retest reliability was poor, but improved with increasing obstacle-length. Twelve participants reported at least one fall. No association of fall incidence with any of the obstacle crossing characteristics was found. Discussion Given the absence of height of the virtual obstacles, obstacle avoidance may have been relatively easy, allowing participants to cross obstacles in multiple ways, increasing variability of crossing characteristics and reducing the association with fall risk. Conclusion These finding cast some doubt on current protocols for testing and training of obstacle avoidance in stroke rehabilitation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)533-538
Number of pages6
JournalGait and Posture
Volume58
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017

Fingerprint

Survivors
Stroke
Reproducibility of Results
Independent Living
Incidence
Toes
Gait
Walking
Extremities
Stroke Rehabilitation
Calendars

Keywords

  • Gait
  • Obstacle crossing
  • Prospective falls
  • Stroke
  • Virtual environment

Cite this

@article{aa0d74a62e7a4550a16f3045f2965450,
title = "Virtual obstacle crossing: Reliability and differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls",
abstract = "Introduction Stroke survivors often fall during walking. To reduce fall risk, gait testing and training with avoidance of virtual obstacles is gaining popularity. However, it is unknown whether and how virtual obstacle crossing is associated with fall risk. Aim The present study assessed whether obstacle crossing characteristics are reliable and assessed differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. Method We recruited twenty-nine community dwelling chronic stroke survivors. Participants crossed five virtual obstacles with increasing lengths. After a break, the test was repeated to assess test-retest reliability. For each obstacle length and trial, we determined; success rate, leading limb preference, pre and post obstacle distance, margins of stability, toe clearance, and crossing step length and speed. Subsequently, fall incidence was monitored using a fall calendar and monthly phone calls over a six-month period. Results Test-retest reliability was poor, but improved with increasing obstacle-length. Twelve participants reported at least one fall. No association of fall incidence with any of the obstacle crossing characteristics was found. Discussion Given the absence of height of the virtual obstacles, obstacle avoidance may have been relatively easy, allowing participants to cross obstacles in multiple ways, increasing variability of crossing characteristics and reducing the association with fall risk. Conclusion These finding cast some doubt on current protocols for testing and training of obstacle avoidance in stroke rehabilitation.",
keywords = "Gait, Obstacle crossing, Prospective falls, Stroke, Virtual environment",
author = "Michiel Punt and Bruijn, {Sjoerd M.} and Harriet Wittink and {van de Port}, {Ingrid G.} and Gijs Wubbels and {van Die{\"e}n}, {Jaap H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.013",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "533--538",
journal = "Gait and Posture",
issn = "0966-6362",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Virtual obstacle crossing : Reliability and differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. / Punt, Michiel; Bruijn, Sjoerd M.; Wittink, Harriet; van de Port, Ingrid G.; Wubbels, Gijs; van Dieën, Jaap H.

In: Gait and Posture, Vol. 58, 01.10.2017, p. 533-538.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtual obstacle crossing

T2 - Reliability and differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls

AU - Punt, Michiel

AU - Bruijn, Sjoerd M.

AU - Wittink, Harriet

AU - van de Port, Ingrid G.

AU - Wubbels, Gijs

AU - van Dieën, Jaap H.

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Introduction Stroke survivors often fall during walking. To reduce fall risk, gait testing and training with avoidance of virtual obstacles is gaining popularity. However, it is unknown whether and how virtual obstacle crossing is associated with fall risk. Aim The present study assessed whether obstacle crossing characteristics are reliable and assessed differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. Method We recruited twenty-nine community dwelling chronic stroke survivors. Participants crossed five virtual obstacles with increasing lengths. After a break, the test was repeated to assess test-retest reliability. For each obstacle length and trial, we determined; success rate, leading limb preference, pre and post obstacle distance, margins of stability, toe clearance, and crossing step length and speed. Subsequently, fall incidence was monitored using a fall calendar and monthly phone calls over a six-month period. Results Test-retest reliability was poor, but improved with increasing obstacle-length. Twelve participants reported at least one fall. No association of fall incidence with any of the obstacle crossing characteristics was found. Discussion Given the absence of height of the virtual obstacles, obstacle avoidance may have been relatively easy, allowing participants to cross obstacles in multiple ways, increasing variability of crossing characteristics and reducing the association with fall risk. Conclusion These finding cast some doubt on current protocols for testing and training of obstacle avoidance in stroke rehabilitation.

AB - Introduction Stroke survivors often fall during walking. To reduce fall risk, gait testing and training with avoidance of virtual obstacles is gaining popularity. However, it is unknown whether and how virtual obstacle crossing is associated with fall risk. Aim The present study assessed whether obstacle crossing characteristics are reliable and assessed differences in stroke survivors who prospectively experienced falls or no falls. Method We recruited twenty-nine community dwelling chronic stroke survivors. Participants crossed five virtual obstacles with increasing lengths. After a break, the test was repeated to assess test-retest reliability. For each obstacle length and trial, we determined; success rate, leading limb preference, pre and post obstacle distance, margins of stability, toe clearance, and crossing step length and speed. Subsequently, fall incidence was monitored using a fall calendar and monthly phone calls over a six-month period. Results Test-retest reliability was poor, but improved with increasing obstacle-length. Twelve participants reported at least one fall. No association of fall incidence with any of the obstacle crossing characteristics was found. Discussion Given the absence of height of the virtual obstacles, obstacle avoidance may have been relatively easy, allowing participants to cross obstacles in multiple ways, increasing variability of crossing characteristics and reducing the association with fall risk. Conclusion These finding cast some doubt on current protocols for testing and training of obstacle avoidance in stroke rehabilitation.

KW - Gait

KW - Obstacle crossing

KW - Prospective falls

KW - Stroke

KW - Virtual environment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029834842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029834842&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.013

DO - 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.013

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 533

EP - 538

JO - Gait and Posture

JF - Gait and Posture

SN - 0966-6362

ER -