Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status

A.J. Gilbert, A. McQuatters-Gollop, O. Langmead, L.D. Mee, J.E. Vermaat

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

181 Downloads (Pure)


We augment discussions about the Good Environmental Status of the North Sea by developing two extreme visions and assessing their societal benefits. One vision (‘Then’) assumes restoration of benthic functioning; we contend that trawling had already degraded the southern North Sea a century ago. Available information is used to speculate about benthic functioning in a relatively undisturbed southern North Sea. The second vision (‘Now’) draws on recent benthic functioning. The supply of five ecosystem services, supported by benthic functioning, is discussed. ‘Then’ offers confidence in the sustainable supply of diverse services but restoration of past function is uncertain and likely to be paired with costs, notably trawling restraints. ‘Now’ delivers known and valued services but sustained delivery is threatened by, for example, climate change. We do not advocate either vision. Our purpose is to stimulate debate about what society wants, and might receive, from the future southern North Sea.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)142-153
JournalAMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment
Issue number2
Early online date27 May 2014
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Visions for the North Sea: The Societal Dilemma Behind Specifying Good Environmental Status'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this