Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades

Luca Wollenberg*, Heiner Deubel, Martin Szinte

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The premotor theory of attention postulates that spatial attention arises from the activation of saccade areas and that the deployment of attention is the consequence of motor programming. Yet attentional and oculomotor processes have been shown to be dissociable at the neuronal level in covert attention tasks. To investigate a potential dissociation at the behavioral level, we instructed human participants to move their eyes (saccade) towards 1 of 2 nearby, competing saccade targets. The spatial distribution of visual attention was determined using oriented visual stimuli presented either at the target locations, between them, or at several other equidistant locations. Results demonstrate that accurate saccades towards one of the targets were associated with presaccadic enhancement of visual sensitivity at the respective saccade endpoint compared to the nonsaccaded target location. In contrast, averaging saccades, landing between the 2 targets, were not associated with attentional facilitation at the saccade endpoint. Rather, attention before averaging saccades was equally deployed at the 2 target locations. Taken together, our results reveal that visual attention is not obligatorily coupled to the endpoint of a subsequent saccade. Rather, our results suggest that the oculomotor program depends on the state of attentional selection before saccade onset and that saccade averaging arises from unresolved attentional selection.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere2006548
JournalPloS Biology
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2018

Funding

FundersFunder number
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme704537

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Visual attention is not deployed at the endpoint of averaging saccades'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this