Abstract
This chapter reflects on the nature of the clarity of Scripture and considers which claims concerning prehistory clash with the biblical testimony The claritas or perspicuitas of the Bible applies to the history of salvation and the historical context in which it occurs. It shows what the role of the natural sciences and the historical sciences might be in the interpretation of the Bible? The right exegesis is part of theological science, but that science is not separate from the other sciences.
| Translated title of the contribution | What role do non-theological sciences have in interpreting the Bible? |
|---|---|
| Original language | Dutch |
| Title of host publication | En God zag dat het goed was |
| Subtitle of host publication | Christelijk geloof en evolutie in 25 cruciale vragen |
| Editors | William den Boer, René Fransen, Rik Peels |
| Place of Publication | Kampen |
| Publisher | Summum Academic Publications |
| Chapter | 5 |
| Pages | 73-87 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789492701060 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
Keywords
- Schriftgezag
- claritas
- oude aarde creationisme
- Schepping
- evolutietheorie
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What role do non-theological sciences have in interpreting the Bible?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver