Abstract
A growing number of organizations pledge to ideals of openness in their organizing processes. However, such attempts to increase openness through greater inclusion and transparency often fail in practice. Using the constitutive view of openness, we seek to unravel how the interaction between modes of openness and closure shapes open organizing as it unfolds over time. Analyzing an award-winning open organizing initiative, we show how four types of legitimate closures are used to increase and sustain openness across time. Against these observations, we propose a process model of punctuated openness, in which open organizing is characterized by a combination of both open and closed modes that generate and sustain desired levels of inclusion and transparency over time.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-6 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Academy of Management Proceedings |
| Volume | 2020 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 29 Jul 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Aug 2020 |
| Event | Academy of Management - Virtual Duration: 8 Aug 2020 → 12 Aug 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Academy of Management Best Paper ProceedingsUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- crowdsourcing
- sustainability
VU Research Profile
- Connected World
- Science for Sustainability
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What does it take to be open? Sustaining openness through closure in open organizing initiatives'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Prizes
-
AOM Best Paper Award
Diriker, D. (Recipient), Porter, A. (Recipient) & Tuertscher, P. (Recipient), Aug 2020
Prize / Grant: Prize › Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver