What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type and search type

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

An important question is whether visual attention (the ability to select relevant visual information) and visual working memory (the ability to retain relevant visual information) share the same content representations. Some past research has indicated that they do: Singleton distractors interfered more strongly with a visual search task when they were identical or related to the object held in memory. However, other research has failed to find such effects despite using very similar procedures. The present study, using the same combined working memory and attentional capture paradigm, demonstrates which factors do (varied mapping, low stimulus energy) and which factors do not (exact type of visual memory method used, difficult nature of search, heterogeneity of displays, and instruction) contribute to this discrepancy. © 2009 American Psychological Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1275-1291
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume35
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Short-Term Memory
Research
Drive
Visual Search
Visual Attention
Paradigm
Distractor
Working Memory
Stimulus
Energy
Visual Memory
Visual Working Memory

Cite this

@article{b165e04cc39b493d9ca308bd1ccf9d2c,
title = "What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type and search type",
abstract = "An important question is whether visual attention (the ability to select relevant visual information) and visual working memory (the ability to retain relevant visual information) share the same content representations. Some past research has indicated that they do: Singleton distractors interfered more strongly with a visual search task when they were identical or related to the object held in memory. However, other research has failed to find such effects despite using very similar procedures. The present study, using the same combined working memory and attentional capture paradigm, demonstrates which factors do (varied mapping, low stimulus energy) and which factors do not (exact type of visual memory method used, difficult nature of search, heterogeneity of displays, and instruction) contribute to this discrepancy. {\circledC} 2009 American Psychological Association.",
author = "C.N.L. Olivers",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1037/a0013896",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "1275--1291",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "5",

}

What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type and search type. / Olivers, C.N.L.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 35, No. 5, 2009, p. 1275-1291.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type and search type

AU - Olivers, C.N.L.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - An important question is whether visual attention (the ability to select relevant visual information) and visual working memory (the ability to retain relevant visual information) share the same content representations. Some past research has indicated that they do: Singleton distractors interfered more strongly with a visual search task when they were identical or related to the object held in memory. However, other research has failed to find such effects despite using very similar procedures. The present study, using the same combined working memory and attentional capture paradigm, demonstrates which factors do (varied mapping, low stimulus energy) and which factors do not (exact type of visual memory method used, difficult nature of search, heterogeneity of displays, and instruction) contribute to this discrepancy. © 2009 American Psychological Association.

AB - An important question is whether visual attention (the ability to select relevant visual information) and visual working memory (the ability to retain relevant visual information) share the same content representations. Some past research has indicated that they do: Singleton distractors interfered more strongly with a visual search task when they were identical or related to the object held in memory. However, other research has failed to find such effects despite using very similar procedures. The present study, using the same combined working memory and attentional capture paradigm, demonstrates which factors do (varied mapping, low stimulus energy) and which factors do not (exact type of visual memory method used, difficult nature of search, heterogeneity of displays, and instruction) contribute to this discrepancy. © 2009 American Psychological Association.

U2 - 10.1037/a0013896

DO - 10.1037/a0013896

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 1275

EP - 1291

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 5

ER -