What is fair punishment for Alex or Ahmed? Perspective taking increases racial bias in retributive justice judgments

J.W. van Prooijen, J.K. Coffeng

    Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    Abstract

    Previous research frequently found that perspective taking may reduce various sorts of racial biases. In the present research, we propose that perspective taking may increase racial bias in the specific context of retributive justice judgments, that is, evaluations of what punishment is considered fair for offenders. In two studies, we manipulated whether or not participants took the perspective of a target offender, who was named either Alex or Ahmed. Results revealed evidence for racial bias under conditions of perspective taking in both studies: Perspective taking increased punishment for Ahmed, but not for Alex, in a theft case (Study 1). Furthermore, perspective taking decreased punishment for Alex, but not for Ahmed, in the case of less severe offense that is less clearly intentional (Study 2). The consequence is similar in both studies: More severe retributive justice judgments for Ahmed than for Alex under conditions of perspective taking. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)383-399
    JournalSocial Justice Research
    Volume26
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'What is fair punishment for Alex or Ahmed? Perspective taking increases racial bias in retributive justice judgments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this