What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We?

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Dynamics has puzzled researchers since long ago. Among them are Greek philosophers such as Zeno of Elea (about 490-425 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC). They pointed at the phenomenon that the world occurs to us in different states at different points in time. However, for the transition from a given physical state to another physical state, it is not always clear from the given physical state what will be different in the next state. For example, Zeno and Aristotle argue that at one specific instant in the physical world (a snapshot) a moving arrow cannot be distinguished from an arrow in rest, yet the next state for a moving arrow is different (e.g., Aristotle, 1931). What is it in this given state that is driving the change to a next state in one case but which apparently is absent in the other case? When no physical property can be found in the given original physical state that can explain this change, what other entity can be there to explain the change? Usually an entity that is not part of physical reality, and therefore cannot be sensed in any way, but still may bring about changes in the physical world, is called a ghost. If for a transition from a given physical state nothing physical can be found in this state that can explain what will be different in the next state, then it may seem that this change has to be attributed to a ghost or ghost-like entity or property in the original state.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationTransactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII
PublisherSpringer/Verlag
Pages212-250
Number of pages39
Volume9760
ISBN (Print)9783662528853
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event23rd International Confererence on Computational Collective Intelligence, Autumn 2015 - Wroclaw, Poland
Duration: 20 Nov 201521 Nov 2015

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume9760
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference23rd International Confererence on Computational Collective Intelligence, Autumn 2015
CountryPoland
CityWroclaw
Period20/11/1521/11/15

Fingerprint

Physical properties
Snapshot
Physical property
Instant

Keywords

  • Dynamics
  • Potentiality

Cite this

Treur, J. (2016). What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We? In Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII (Vol. 9760, pp. 212-250). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9760). Springer/Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14
Treur, Jan. / What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We?. Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII. Vol. 9760 Springer/Verlag, 2016. pp. 212-250 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)).
@inproceedings{7e3751fb92404bc59aea63f2740040d4,
title = "What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We?",
abstract = "Dynamics has puzzled researchers since long ago. Among them are Greek philosophers such as Zeno of Elea (about 490-425 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC). They pointed at the phenomenon that the world occurs to us in different states at different points in time. However, for the transition from a given physical state to another physical state, it is not always clear from the given physical state what will be different in the next state. For example, Zeno and Aristotle argue that at one specific instant in the physical world (a snapshot) a moving arrow cannot be distinguished from an arrow in rest, yet the next state for a moving arrow is different (e.g., Aristotle, 1931). What is it in this given state that is driving the change to a next state in one case but which apparently is absent in the other case? When no physical property can be found in the given original physical state that can explain this change, what other entity can be there to explain the change? Usually an entity that is not part of physical reality, and therefore cannot be sensed in any way, but still may bring about changes in the physical world, is called a ghost. If for a transition from a given physical state nothing physical can be found in this state that can explain what will be different in the next state, then it may seem that this change has to be attributed to a ghost or ghost-like entity or property in the original state.",
keywords = "Dynamics, Potentiality",
author = "Jan Treur",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783662528853",
volume = "9760",
series = "Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)",
publisher = "Springer/Verlag",
pages = "212--250",
booktitle = "Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII",

}

Treur, J 2016, What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We? in Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII. vol. 9760, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 9760, Springer/Verlag, pp. 212-250, 23rd International Confererence on Computational Collective Intelligence, Autumn 2015, Wroclaw, Poland, 20/11/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14

What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We? / Treur, Jan.

Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII. Vol. 9760 Springer/Verlag, 2016. p. 212-250 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Vol. 9760).

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingConference contributionAcademicpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We?

AU - Treur, Jan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Dynamics has puzzled researchers since long ago. Among them are Greek philosophers such as Zeno of Elea (about 490-425 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC). They pointed at the phenomenon that the world occurs to us in different states at different points in time. However, for the transition from a given physical state to another physical state, it is not always clear from the given physical state what will be different in the next state. For example, Zeno and Aristotle argue that at one specific instant in the physical world (a snapshot) a moving arrow cannot be distinguished from an arrow in rest, yet the next state for a moving arrow is different (e.g., Aristotle, 1931). What is it in this given state that is driving the change to a next state in one case but which apparently is absent in the other case? When no physical property can be found in the given original physical state that can explain this change, what other entity can be there to explain the change? Usually an entity that is not part of physical reality, and therefore cannot be sensed in any way, but still may bring about changes in the physical world, is called a ghost. If for a transition from a given physical state nothing physical can be found in this state that can explain what will be different in the next state, then it may seem that this change has to be attributed to a ghost or ghost-like entity or property in the original state.

AB - Dynamics has puzzled researchers since long ago. Among them are Greek philosophers such as Zeno of Elea (about 490-425 BC) and Aristotle (384-322 BC). They pointed at the phenomenon that the world occurs to us in different states at different points in time. However, for the transition from a given physical state to another physical state, it is not always clear from the given physical state what will be different in the next state. For example, Zeno and Aristotle argue that at one specific instant in the physical world (a snapshot) a moving arrow cannot be distinguished from an arrow in rest, yet the next state for a moving arrow is different (e.g., Aristotle, 1931). What is it in this given state that is driving the change to a next state in one case but which apparently is absent in the other case? When no physical property can be found in the given original physical state that can explain this change, what other entity can be there to explain the change? Usually an entity that is not part of physical reality, and therefore cannot be sensed in any way, but still may bring about changes in the physical world, is called a ghost. If for a transition from a given physical state nothing physical can be found in this state that can explain what will be different in the next state, then it may seem that this change has to be attributed to a ghost or ghost-like entity or property in the original state.

KW - Dynamics

KW - Potentiality

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977490512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977490512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14

DO - 10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9783662528853

VL - 9760

T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

SP - 212

EP - 250

BT - Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII

PB - Springer/Verlag

ER -

Treur J. What Is It That Drives Dynamics: We Don't Believe in Ghosts, Do We? In Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXIII. Vol. 9760. Springer/Verlag. 2016. p. 212-250. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-52886-0_14