Abstract
Adults in socially vulnerable positions can benefit from participation in community sports programs. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the effective elements of these programs. To identify these elements, we consulted three groups of stakeholders: social sports coaches, program coordinators, and social workers. The effective elements were systematically arranged by means of group concept mapping (GCM), a mixed-methods approach for organizing thoughts. The social sports coaches (n = 14) mentioned 152 effective elements, the program coordinators (n = 5) mentioned 81 effective elements and the social workers (n = 8) mentioned 115 effective elements. Overlapping effective elements were mentioned by all three stakeholder groups, such as the role of the social sports coach, a safe sports climate, and structure of sports programs. However, the sport-specific knowledge and skills of coaches were mentioned only by program coordinators. Moreover, only the social workers provided elements that were protective in nature, such as not overburdening the participants. Average importance scores differed for these elements within groups and between groups. In conclusion, various effective elements were deemed necessary for community sports programs to be successful. Moreover, GCM appeared a successful tool to systematically identify effective elements of an intervention from the perspective of relevant stakeholders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102420 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-15 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Evaluation and Program planning |
Volume | 104 |
Early online date | 15 Mar 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.Funding
This study is part of the Life Experience Through Sports (LETS) research project funded by a Dutch research council called NWO (54-6003-001). In this four-year project, the societal value of community sports programs serving adults in a socially vulnerable position is investigated. Ethical approval was obtained from the Social Sciences Ethics Committee of Wageningen University and Research (03-03-2021). The project was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development ZonMw, project no. 50-54600-98-210. The funders were not involved in the conduct of the study nor in the preparation of the manuscript.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Dutch research council called NWO | 54-6003-001 |
ZonMw | 50-54600-98-210 |
ZonMw |