What matters for keeping or losing support in televised debates

Pascal D. König, Thomas Waldvogel

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

What leads citizens to change their candidate preferences during televised debates? The present paper addresses this question with real-time response and panel survey data from respondents recruited in the run-up to the 2017 German national election. Probing the importance of party identity and performance perceptions formed during the debate, the analysis more closely examines several core determinants than has previously been done with real-time response data. The findings suggest, first, that only a strong or very strong party identity is an effective barrier to candidate preference change. Second, beyond party identity, ratings of candidates’ issue-specific statements on policy issues show a very strong effect, albeit regardless of personal issue importance. Third, this influence of candidate ratings does not seem to be mediated through changes in valence perceptions. Rather, viewers seem to form a general impression of the candidates which cannot be reduced to performance perceptions regarding policy issues.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)312-329
JournalEuropean Journal of Communication
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What matters for keeping or losing support in televised debates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this