What's school got to do with it? Comparing educational aspirations of Dutch and English ‘white’ girls from lower socioeconomic backgrounds

Talitha Stam, Maurice Crul

Research output: Chapter in Book / Report / Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Various studies have shown how institutional arrangements in education determine further education and occupational opportunities. By combining the wider literature on the effects of institutional arrangements with the studies on pupils’ aspirations, this chapter aims to explore how institutional arrangements in education may influence pupils’ aspirations. For this, we contrast the stories of two 15-year-old ethnic white working-class girls with a similar aspiration, but attending two internationally very different schools, namely a Dutch lower vocational secondary school, and an English state-funded comprehensive secondary school. Their stories were recorded over a two-year period as part of a larger ethnographic study on the aspiration of ethnic white working-class girls in secondary schools. Through the concepts, reasons and resources of pupils’ aspirations these stories will be analysed to unravel how specific features in the Dutch and English education systems influence the distinctive ways of shaping their aspirations.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComparative Perspectives on Early School Leaving in the European Union
Editors Lore Van Praag, Ward Nouwen, Rut Van Caudenberg, Noel Clycq, Christiane Timmerman
PublisherRoutledge
Chapter8
Pages117-131
Number of pages15
ISBN (Electronic)9781315170404, 9781351691819, 9781351691802, 9781351691796
ISBN (Print)9781138048072
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Publication series

NameRoutledge Research in International and Comparative Education
PublisherRoutledge

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What's school got to do with it? Comparing educational aspirations of Dutch and English ‘white’ girls from lower socioeconomic backgrounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this