When a Celebrity Endorser is Disgraced: A Twenty Five Year Event Study

S. Bratz, A.E. Molchanov, P.A. Stork

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This paper investigates how the announcement of negative information about a celebrity endorser impacts firm value, as measured by abnormal stock returns. The unique data sample consists of 93 celebrity disgraces that occurred between 1986 and 2011, affecting firms listed on US stock exchanges. Some evidence is documented of negative and statistically significant abnormal returns around these events. Returns are lower when the disgrace attracts much media attention, or when the celebrity itself is prominent. No significant returns are observed when a firm decides to terminate its endorsement contract with the disgraced celebrity. Endorsement contracts for "edgy" products, for which consumers may actually be attracted by negative publicity, are less likely to be terminated. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-141
Number of pages11
JournalMarketing Letters
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Celebrity
Event study
Endorsements
Abnormal returns
Stock exchange
Firm value
Announcement
Stock returns
Negative publicity

Cite this

Bratz, S. ; Molchanov, A.E. ; Stork, P.A. / When a Celebrity Endorser is Disgraced: A Twenty Five Year Event Study. In: Marketing Letters. 2013 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 131-141.
@article{46f0aa7d35304a338afc80a0ddee970c,
title = "When a Celebrity Endorser is Disgraced: A Twenty Five Year Event Study",
abstract = "This paper investigates how the announcement of negative information about a celebrity endorser impacts firm value, as measured by abnormal stock returns. The unique data sample consists of 93 celebrity disgraces that occurred between 1986 and 2011, affecting firms listed on US stock exchanges. Some evidence is documented of negative and statistically significant abnormal returns around these events. Returns are lower when the disgrace attracts much media attention, or when the celebrity itself is prominent. No significant returns are observed when a firm decides to terminate its endorsement contract with the disgraced celebrity. Endorsement contracts for {"}edgy{"} products, for which consumers may actually be attracted by negative publicity, are less likely to be terminated. {\circledC} 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.",
author = "S. Bratz and A.E. Molchanov and P.A. Stork",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1007/s11002-013-9229-2",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "131--141",
journal = "Marketing Letters",
issn = "0923-0645",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

When a Celebrity Endorser is Disgraced: A Twenty Five Year Event Study. / Bratz, S.; Molchanov, A.E.; Stork, P.A.

In: Marketing Letters, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2013, p. 131-141.

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - When a Celebrity Endorser is Disgraced: A Twenty Five Year Event Study

AU - Bratz, S.

AU - Molchanov, A.E.

AU - Stork, P.A.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This paper investigates how the announcement of negative information about a celebrity endorser impacts firm value, as measured by abnormal stock returns. The unique data sample consists of 93 celebrity disgraces that occurred between 1986 and 2011, affecting firms listed on US stock exchanges. Some evidence is documented of negative and statistically significant abnormal returns around these events. Returns are lower when the disgrace attracts much media attention, or when the celebrity itself is prominent. No significant returns are observed when a firm decides to terminate its endorsement contract with the disgraced celebrity. Endorsement contracts for "edgy" products, for which consumers may actually be attracted by negative publicity, are less likely to be terminated. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

AB - This paper investigates how the announcement of negative information about a celebrity endorser impacts firm value, as measured by abnormal stock returns. The unique data sample consists of 93 celebrity disgraces that occurred between 1986 and 2011, affecting firms listed on US stock exchanges. Some evidence is documented of negative and statistically significant abnormal returns around these events. Returns are lower when the disgrace attracts much media attention, or when the celebrity itself is prominent. No significant returns are observed when a firm decides to terminate its endorsement contract with the disgraced celebrity. Endorsement contracts for "edgy" products, for which consumers may actually be attracted by negative publicity, are less likely to be terminated. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

U2 - 10.1007/s11002-013-9229-2

DO - 10.1007/s11002-013-9229-2

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 131

EP - 141

JO - Marketing Letters

JF - Marketing Letters

SN - 0923-0645

IS - 2

ER -