When Helping Hurts: Children Think Groups That Receive Help Are Less Smart

Jellie Sierksma, Kristin Shutts

Research output: Contribution to JournalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Helping has many positive consequences for both helpers and recipients. However, in the present research, we considered a possible downside to receiving help: that it signals a deficiency. We investigated whether young children make inferences about intelligence from observing some groups of people receive help and other groups not. In a novel group paradigm, we show that children (4-6 years) think groups that receive help are less smart (n = 44) but not less nice (n = 45). Children also generalized their inferences about relative intelligence to new group members (n = 55; forced-choice-method). These results have implications for understanding how children develop stereotypes about intelligence as well as for educational practices that group children according to their ability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)715-723
Number of pages9
JournalChild Development
Volume91
Issue number3
Early online date3 Jan 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2020

Bibliographical note

© 2020 The Authors. Child Development published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Research in Child Development.

Funding

FundersFunder number
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentU54HD090256
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek446-16-011

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'When Helping Hurts: Children Think Groups That Receive Help Are Less Smart'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this